Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    EARTH    |    Uhh, that 3rd rock from the sun?    |    8,931 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,859 of 8,931    |
|    ScienceDaily to All    |
|    Carbon taxes that focus on luxury consum    |
|    11 Jul 23 22:30:30    |
      MSGID: 1:317/3 64ae2c80       PID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08        Carbon taxes that focus on luxury consumption are fairer than those that       tax all emissions equally                Date:        July 11, 2023        Source:        Cell Press        Summary:        Not all carbon emissions are made for the same reason -- they range        from more essential purposes like heating a home to nonessential        'luxury' activities like leisure travel. However, proposals for the        implementations of carbon taxes tend to apply to all emissions at        an equal rate. This can give rise to and exacerbate inequalities. A        new analysis suggests taxing luxury carbon emissions at a higher        rate instead; if all 88 countries analyzed in this study adopted        the luxury- focused policy, this would achieve 75% of the emissions        reduction needed to reach the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting        climate change to well below 2DEGC by 2050.                      Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email              ==========================================================================       FULL STORY       ==========================================================================       Not all carbon emissions are made for the same reason -- they range from       more essential purposes like heating a home to nonessential "luxury"       activities like leisure travel. However, proposals for the implementations       of carbon taxes tend to apply to all emissions at an equal rate. This       can give rise to and exacerbate inequalities. A new analysis published       on July 11 in the journal One Earth suggests taxing luxury carbon       emissions at a higher rate instead; if all 88 countries analyzed in       this study adopted the luxury-focused policy, this would achieve 75%       of the emissions reduction needed to reach the Paris Agreement's goal       of limiting climate change to well below 2DEGC by 2050.              "There is an injustice in terms of who uses energy, or carbon, for basic       or luxury purposes, but it hasn't been translated into explicit policy       yet," says Yannick Oswald, an economist at the University of Leeds. "In       this study, we test policies derived from this knowledge for the first       time." Several countries -- such as Canada and Mexico -- have active       carbon pricing policies. These policies either price all emissions at an       equal rate or target one type of emission, such as heat or fuel. However,       past research has shown that, in high-income countries, these policies       tend to affect low-income households the most while failing to have       a large impact on emissions. This might be because resources such as       heat or fuel make up a greater portion of low-income spending and are       difficult to do without.              To test the impact of a tax program that distinguishes between carbon       emissions from basic or luxury activities, the researchers built a model       based on household carbon footprints from 88 different countries. For       each country, they designed a tax rate for different types of purchases,       ensuring activities that make up a greater proportion of low-income       spending would be taxed less relative to activities that make up a       greater proportion of high-income spending. In the US, for example,       vacation travel would be taxed at a higher rate than heating.              They used this model to test the outcome of either their luxury carbon       tax rates or a uniform carbon tax rate. Under a uniform tax rate, 37%       of global carbon tax revenue would come from luxury purchases. This       increases to 52% under a luxury-focused tax program.              Not only was the luxury tax "fairer" based on household income --       affecting low-income households less and high-income households more --       it also was slightly better at reducing yearly household emissions in       the very short-term.              The researchers note that this might be because it is more feasible to       forgo luxury purchases than an essential purchase if the price increases.              While the luxury tax proved fairer in all countries studied, the       researchers found that, in low-income countries, a uniform tax could       also be fair. In South Africa, for example, low-income households already       spend much less on fuel or heating than high-income households. Thus, a       uniform carbon tax is already targeting high-income groups by design. In       contrast, the luxury carbon tax is most beneficial in terms of fairness       when applied to high-income countries.              This tax can better account for flexible, nonessential purchases       in countries like the United States, where it is difficult to avoid       carbon-emitting activities like driving a car in a low-income lifestyle.              While this type of policy could make significant progress towards reducing       global emissions, the researchers also note that this goal might be       difficult to achieve in practice. Few countries have a carbon tax scheme       that is currently this rigorous. Luxury-focused carbon taxation also       targets high- income groups, which may be the most equipped to lobby       against such a policy going into effect.              "Global support by the public for fair climate policies is high, and       it is likely that luxury-focused carbon taxes are similarly popular,"       says Oswald.              "Despite the model's limitations, the big takeaway is this: when designing       climate policies, it is possible to pay attention to the different nature       of consumption purposes, and this would improve the fairness of climate       policy almost by default."        * RELATED_TOPICS        o Earth_&_Climate        # Global_Warming # Environmental_Policy # Climate #        Air_Quality        o Science_&_Society        # Poverty_and_Learning # Educational_Policy #        Resource_Shortage # Environmental_Policies        * RELATED_TERMS        o Climate_change_mitigation o        Climate_model o Automobile_emissions_control o        IPCC_Report_on_Climate_Change_-_2007 o Global_climate_model o        Ocean_acidification o Climate_engineering o Sulfur_hexafluoride              ==========================================================================               Print               Email               Share       ==========================================================================       ****** 1 ****** ***** 2 ***** **** 3 ****       *** 4 *** ** 5 ** Breaking this hour       ==========================================================================        * Revolutionary_Electric_Artificial_Muscles *        Age_of_Universe:_26.7,_Not_13.7,_Billion_Years *        City_Ground_Is_Deforming:_Buildings_Aren't_Ready        * The_Sound_of_Silence?_People_Hear_It *        36-Million-Year_Geological_Cycle_Drives_...               * Six_Foods_to_Boost_Cardiovascular_Health        * Cystic_Fibrosis:_Lasting_Improvement *        Artificial_Cells_Demonstrate_That_'Life_...               * Advice_to_Limit_High-Fat_Dairy_Foods_Challenged *        First_Snapshots_of_Fermion_Pairs              Trending Topics this week       ==========================================================================       PLANTS_&_ANIMALS Nature Botany Endangered_Plants EARTH_&_CLIMATE Climate       Sustainability Water FOSSILS_&_RUINS Early_Climate                     ==========================================================================              Strange & Offbeat       ==========================================================================       PLANTS_&_ANIMALS       Bees_Make_Decisions_Better_and_Faster_Than_We_Do,_for_the_Things_That_Matter_to       Them       These_Lollipops_Could_'Sweeten'_Diagnostic_Testing_for_Kids_and_Adults_Alike       Why_There_Are_No_Kangaroos_in_Bali_(and_No_Tigers_in_Australia)       EARTH_&_CLIMATE       Turning_Old_Maps_Into_3D_Digital_Models_of_Lost_Neighborhoods       Squash_Bugs_Are_Attracted_to_and_Eat_Each_Other's_Poop_to_Stock_Their       Microbiome How_Urea_May_Have_Been_the_Gateway_to_Life FOSSILS_&_RUINS       Giant_Stone_Artefacts_Found_on_Rare_Ice_Age_Site_in_Kent,_UK       Fossils_Reveal_How_Ancient_Birds_Molted_Their_Feathers_--_Which_Could_Help       Explain_Why_Ancestors_of_Modern_Birds_Survived_When_All_the_Other_Dinosaurs       Died Apex_Predator_of_the_Cambrian_Likely_Sought_Soft_Over_Crunchy_Prey       Story Source: Materials provided by Cell_Press. Note: Content may be       edited for style and length.                     ==========================================================================       Journal Reference:        1. Yannick Oswald, Joel Millward-Hopkins, Julia K. Steinberger,        Anne Owen,        Diana Ivanova. Luxury-focused carbon taxation improves fairness of        climate policy. One Earth, 2023; DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.027       ==========================================================================              Link to news story:       https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230711133113.htm              --- up 1 year, 19 weeks, 1 day, 10 hours, 50 minutes        * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 114/705 123/120 153/7715 218/700 226/30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 229/110 112 113 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 291/111 292/854       SEEN-BY: 298/25 305/3 317/3 320/219 396/45 5075/35       PATH: 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca