Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    EARTH    |    Uhh, that 3rd rock from the sun?    |    8,931 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,467 of 8,931    |
|    ScienceDaily to All    |
|    The problems with coal ash start smaller    |
|    06 Jun 23 22:30:30    |
      MSGID: 1:317/3 648007f7       PID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08        The problems with coal ash start smaller than anyone thought         How well toxic elements leach out of coal ash depends on the ash's       nanoscale composition                Date:        June 6, 2023        Source:        Duke University        Summary:        Burning coal doesn't only pollute the air. The resulting ash        can leach toxic chemicals into the local environments where        it's kept. New research shows that the toxicity of various ash        stockpiles relies heavily on its nanoscale structures, which vary        widely between sources. The results will help researchers predict        which coal ash is most environmentally dangerous.                      Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email              ==========================================================================       FULL STORY       ==========================================================================       Everyone knows that burning coal causes air pollution that is harmful to       the climate and human health. But the ash left over can often be harmful       as well.              For example, Duke Energy long stored a liquified form of coal ash in 36       large ponds across the Carolinas. That all changed in 2014, when a spill       at its Dan River site released 27 million gallons of ash pond water into       the local environment. The incident raised concerns about the dangers       associated with even trace amounts of toxic elements like arsenic and       selenium in the ash.              Little was known, however, about just how much of these hazardous       materials were present in the ash water or how easily they could       contaminate the surrounding environment.              Fears of future spills and seepage caused Duke Energy to agree to pay $1.1       billion to decommission most of its coal ash ponds over the coming years.              Meanwhile, researchers are working on better ways of putting the ash to       use, such as recycling it to recover valuable rare earth elements or       incorporating it into building materials such as concrete. But to put       any potential solution into action, researchers still must know which       sources of coal ash pose a hazardous risk due to its chemical makeup --       a question that scientists still struggle to answer.              In a new paper published June 6 in the journal Environmental Science:       Nano, researchers at Duke University have discovered that these answers       may remain elusive because nobody is thinking small enough. Using one of       the newest, most advanced synchrotron light sources in the world -- the       National Synchrotron Light Source II at Brookhaven National Laboratory       -- the authors show that, at least for selenium and arsenic, the amount       of toxic elements able to escape from coal ash depends largely on their       nanoscale structures.              "These results show just how complex coal ash is as a material," said       Helen Hsu-Kim, professor of civil and environmental engineering at       Duke University.              "For example, we saw arsenic and selenium either attached to the surface       of fine grain particles or encapsulated within them, which explains       why these elements leach out of some coal ash sources more readily       than others." It's long been known that factors in the surrounding       environment such as pH affect how well toxic elements can move from source       to surroundings. In previous research, Hsu-Kim showed that the amount       of oxygen in a toxin's surroundings can greatly affect its chemistry,       and that different sources of coal ash produce vastly different levels       of byproducts.              But just because one source of coal ash is high in arsenic doesn't       necessarily mean that high amounts of arsenic will leach out of       it. Similarly, various sources of ash respond differently to the same       environmental conditions. The problem is complex, to say the least. To       take a different approach, Hsu-Kim decided to take an even closer look       at the source itself.              "Researchers in the field typically use x-ray microscopy with a resolution       of one or two micrometers, which is about the same size as the fly ash       particles themselves," Hsu-Kim said. "So if a single particle is a single       pixel, you're not seeing how the elements are distributed across it."       To shrink these pictures' pixels to the nanoscale, Hsu-Kim turned to       Catherine Peters, professor of civil and environmental engineering at       Princeton University, and her colleagues to acquire time on the National       Synchrotron Light Source II. The futuristic machine creates light       beams 10 billion times brighter than the sun to reveal the chemical and       atomic structure of materials using light beams ranging from infrared       to hard X-rays.              Brookhaven's capabilities were able to provide the researchers a       nanoscale map of each particle along with the distribution of elements       in each particle. The incredible resolution revealed that coal ash is       a compilation of particles of all kinds and sizes.              For example, in one sample the researchers saw individual nanoparticles of       selenium that were attached to bigger particles of coal ash, which is a       chemical form of selenium that probably isn't very soluble in water. But       most of the ash had arsenic and selenium either locked inside individual       grains or attached at the surface with relatively weak ionic bonds that       are easily broken.              "It was almost like we saw something different in every sample we looked       at," Hsu-Kim said. "The wide array of differences really highlights why       the main characteristic that we care about -- how much of these elements       leach out of the ash -- varies so much between different samples."       While nobody can say for sure what causes the coal ash to develop its       unique composition, Hsu-Kim guesses that it is likely mostly related to       how the coal was originally formed millions of years ago. But it might       also have something to do with the power plants that burn the coal. Some       plants inject activated carbon or lime into the flue gas, which captures       mercury and sulfur emissions, respectively. At 1000 degrees Fahrenheit,       toxins such as arsenic and selenium in the flue are gaseous, and the       physics that dictate how the particles will cool and recombine to form       ash is uncontrollable.              But regardless of the how, researchers now know that they should be paying       closer attention to the fine details encapsulated within the end results.              This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy       (DE-FE0031748) and the National Institute of Environmental Health       Sciences (5U2C-ES030851). This research utilized U.S. DOE Office of       Science User Facility resources at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation       Lightsource facility operated by SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory       (DE-AC02-76SF0051) and at the Hard X-ray Nanoprobe (HXN) Beamline at       3-ID of the National Synchrotron Light Source II facility operated by       Brookhaven National Laboratory (DE-SC0012704).               * RELATED_TOPICS        o Matter_&_Energy        # Petroleum # Fossil_Fuels # Energy_Policy #        Energy_and_Resources        o Earth_&_Climate        # Energy_and_the_Environment # Environmental_Science #        Hazardous_Waste # Environmental_Issues        * RELATED_TERMS        o Volcanic_ash o Coal o Pyroclastic_flow_from_volcanoes        o Fireworks o Volcano o Fossil_fuel o Pompeii o        Making_existing_structures_earthquake_resistant              ==========================================================================       Story Source: Materials provided by Duke_University. Original written       by Ken Kingery. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.                     ==========================================================================       Journal Reference:        1. Nelson A Rivera, Florence T Ling, Zehao Jin, Ajith Pattammattel,        Hanfei        Yan, Yong Chu, Catherine Peters, Heileen Hsu-Kim. Nanoscale        heterogeneity of arsenic and selenium species in coal fly ash        particles: Analysis using enhanced spectroscopic imaging and        speciation techniques. Environmental Science: Nano, 2023; DOI:        10.1039/D2EN01056A       ==========================================================================              Link to news story:       https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/06/230606111655.htm              --- up 1 year, 14 weeks, 1 day, 10 hours, 50 minutes        * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 114/705 123/120 153/7715 218/700 226/30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 229/110 112 113 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 291/111 292/854       SEEN-BY: 298/25 305/3 317/3 320/219 396/45       PATH: 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca