Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    EARTH    |    Uhh, that 3rd rock from the sun?    |    8,931 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,310 of 8,931    |
|    ScienceDaily to All    |
|    Gender trumps politics in determining pe    |
|    24 May 23 22:30:30    |
      MSGID: 1:317/3 646ee495       PID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08        Gender trumps politics in determining people's ability to read others'       minds                Date:        May 24, 2023        Source:        University of Bath        Summary:        Researchers at the University of Bath surveyed over 4,000 people        to test social ability and found that being female and educated        are some of the best predictors for how well you get on with and        understand others.                      Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email              ==========================================================================       FULL STORY       ==========================================================================       Political parties regularly claim to have their finger on the pulse and       be able to read the public mood. Yet a new study challenges the idea that       being political makes you good at understanding others: it shows gender,       not politics, is a far more important factor in determining people's       social skills.              Analysis of a sample of 4,000 people from across the UK, compiled by a       team of psychologists at the University of Bath, highlights that being       female and educated are the biggest determinants of whether you can       understand or read others' minds.              For their study the psychologists looked at qualities associated with       understanding others such as agreeableness, picking up on subtle clues       and self-reflection. In psychology, this is known as 'theory of mind': the       capacity to understand other people by ascribing mental states to them.              The team stress these results represent averages, but they say their study       is an important reminder about the drivers of agreement and disagreement       in public life. Their findings are published today (Wednesday 24 June)       in the journal PLOS One.              Age was only associated with understanding others in later life: on       average, older people had poorer ability to understand other people.              Dr Punit Shah, Senior author, Associate Professor and leading expert       on social cognitive processing at the University of Bath explains:       "In a world where it seems increasingly difficult to hold and express       different points of view, it is crucial that we understand the barriers       to connecting with other people.              "Political views are often thought of as such a barrier, but our research       actually shows that a person's politics is not, in fact, linked to how       well they understand others.              "Importantly, we didn't just find an absence of evidence for a political       link in the study. The analyses also provided evidence of absence for       this link.              This is a socially important finding that might help to break down some       artificially constructed barriers between people and ultimately improve       understanding between different people in our society." Shah argues       that the link between being educated and female and better understanding       other perspectives is also important.              He adds: "Historically male perspectives have been prioritised in       society. We are of course seeing this narrative diminish over time, and       research like ours adds extra evidence to highlight the important role       of education and being female for social understanding and cohesion       in society -- far more so than politics." To conduct the research,       the team asked members of the public to provide details about their       socio-demographic background, as well as to score their political beliefs       (ranging from 1 = very liberal, to 7 = very conservative).              They also used a 'mindreading test' to ascertain how well participants       understood what other people are thinking.              This test -- developed by the same team in 2021 -- asks a series of       simple statements, such as: 'I can usually understand another person's       viewpoint, even if it differs from my own'; and 'I find it easy to put       myself in somebody else's shoes'.              Lead researcher, Dr Rachel Clutterbuck, emphasised that these findings       could improve our understanding of social differences between people:       "The reasons for why some people are better at understanding others       are not well understood, but this research provides a glimpse into some       individual differences, such as gender, which may help to explain these       social differences.              "Our results are new because the study considered so many factors --       like gender, education, age, and politics -- in tandem, rather than       looking at them separately as often happens. When we do this, it is       clear to see that gender is, by far, most strongly linked to how well       others are understood. This finding highlights the complexity of social       life and reminds us to consider the various factors that may contribute       to understanding and getting on with someone."        * RELATED_TOPICS        o Mind_&_Brain        # Gender_Difference # Social_Psychology # Relationships #        Multiple_Sclerosis # Psychology # Behavior # Perception        # Racial_Issues        * RELATED_TERMS        o Autism o Aptitude o Social_cognition o Social_psychology        o Mensa_International o Mirror_test o Psycholinguistics        o Education              ==========================================================================       Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Bath. Note: Content       may be edited for style and length.                     ==========================================================================       Journal Reference:        1. Rachel A. Clutterbuck, Mitchell J. Callan, Punit        Shah. Socio-demographic        and political predictors of Theory of Mind in adulthood. PLOS ONE,        2023; 18 (5): e0284960 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284960       ==========================================================================              Link to news story:       https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/05/230524181809.htm              --- up 1 year, 12 weeks, 2 days, 10 hours, 50 minutes        * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 114/705 123/120 153/7715 218/700 226/30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 229/110 112 113 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 291/111 292/854       SEEN-BY: 298/25 305/3 317/3 320/219 396/45       PATH: 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca