Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    EARTH    |    Uhh, that 3rd rock from the sun?    |    8,931 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,959 of 8,931    |
|    ScienceDaily to All    |
|    Tiny eye movements are under a surprisin    |
|    03 Apr 23 22:30:20    |
      MSGID: 1:317/3 642ba7e2       PID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08        Tiny eye movements are under a surprising degree of cognitive control                      Date:        April 3, 2023        Source:        Weill Cornell Medicine        Summary:        A very subtle and seemingly random type of eye movement called        ocular drift can be influenced by prior knowledge of the expected        visual target, suggesting a surprising level of cognitive control        over the eyes, according to a new study.                      Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email       FULL STORY       ==========================================================================       A very subtle and seemingly random type of eye movement called ocular       drift can be influenced by prior knowledge of the expected visual target,       suggesting a surprising level of cognitive control over the eyes,       according to a study led by Weill Cornell Medicine neuroscientists.                     ==========================================================================       The discovery, described Apr. 3 in Current Biology, adds to the scientific       understanding of how vision -- far from being a mere absorption of       incoming signals from the retina -- is controlled and directed by       cognitive processes.              "These eye movements are so tiny that we're not even conscious of them,       and yet our brains somehow can use the knowledge of the visual task to       control them," says study lead author Dr. Yen-Chu Lin, who carried out the       work as a Fred Plum Fellow in Systems Neurology and Neuroscience in the       Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute at Weill Cornell Medicine.              Dr. Lin works in the laboratory of study senior author Dr. Jonathan       Victor, the Fred Plum Professor of Neurology at Weill Cornell Medicine.              The study involved a close collaboration with the laboratory of       Dr. Michele Rucci, professor of brain and cognitive sciences and       neuroscience at the University of Rochester.              Neuroscientists have known for decades that information stored in       memory can strongly shape the processing of sensory inputs, including       the streams of visual data coming from the eyes. In other words, what       we see is influenced by what we expect to see or the requirements of       the task at hand.              Most studies of cognitive control over eye movement have covered more       obvious movements, such as the "saccade" movements in which the eyes       dart across large parts of the visual field. In the new study, Drs. Lin       and Victor and their colleagues examined ocular drift, tiny jitters of       the eye that occur even when gaze seems fixed. Ocular drifts are subtle       motions that shift a visual target on the retina by distances on the       order of a fraction of a millimeter or so - - across just a few dozen       photoreceptors (cones). They are thought to improve detection of small,       stationary details in a visual scene by scanning across them, effectively       converting spatial details into trains of visual signals in time.              Prior studies had suggested that ocular drift and other small-scale       "fixational eye movements" are under cognitive control only in a broad       sense -- for example, slowing when scanning across more finely detailed       scenes. In the new study, the researchers found evidence for a more       precise type of control.              Using sensitive equipment in Dr. Rucci's laboratory, the researchers       recorded ocular drifts in six volunteers who were asked to identify which       of a pair of letters (H vs. N, or E vs. F) was being shown to them on       a background of random visual noise. Based on computational modeling,       the scientists expected that optimal eye movements for discriminating       between letters would cross the key elements distinguishing the letters       at right angles. Thus, they hypothesized that a more precise cognitive       control, if it existed, would tend to direct ocular drift in both       vertical and oblique (lower left to upper right) directions for the H       vs. N discrimination, compared to more strictly vertical movements for       the E vs. F discrimination.              They found that the subjects' eye movements did indeed tend to follow       these patterns -- even in the 20 percent of trials in which the subjects,       though expecting to see a letter, were shown only noise. The latter       result showed that the cognitive control of ocular drift could be driven       solely by specific prior knowledge of the visual task, independently of       any incoming visual information.              "These results underscore the interrelationship between the sensory and       the motor parts of vision -- one really can't view them separately,"       said Dr.              Victor, who is also a professor of neuroscience in the Feil Family Brain       and Mind Research Institute at Weill Cornell.              He noted that the direction of fine eye movements is thought to come from       neurons in the brainstem, whereas the task knowledge presumably resides       in the upper brain: the cortex -- implying some kind of non-conscious       connection between them.              "The subjects are aware of the tasks they have to do, yet they don't       know that their eyes are executing these tiny movements, even when you       tell them," Dr.              Victor said.              Studies of this pathway, he added, could lead to better insights not only       into the neuroscience of vision, but possibly also visual disorders --       which traditionally have been seen as disorders of the retina or sensory       processing within the brain.              "What our findings suggest is that visual disorders may sometimes have a       motor component too, since optimal vision depends on the brain's ability       to execute these very tiny movements," Dr. Victor said.               * RELATED_TOPICS        o Mind_&_Brain        # Intelligence # Perception # Brain-Computer_Interfaces        # Neuroscience # Behavior # Psychology # Dementia #        Brain_Injury        * RELATED_TERMS        o Dominant_eye_in_vision o Eye o Cognition o Animal_cognition        o Bitemporal_hemianopsia o Passive-aggressive_behavior o        Visual_perception o Cognitive_neuroscience              ==========================================================================       Story Source: Materials provided by Weill_Cornell_Medicine. Note:       Content may be edited for style and length.                     ==========================================================================       Journal Reference:        1. Yen-Chu Lin, Janis Intoy, Ashley M. Clark, Michele Rucci,        Jonathan D.               Victor. Cognitive influences on fixational eye movements. Current        Biology, 2023; DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.03.026       ==========================================================================              Link to news story:       https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230403133521.htm              --- up 1 year, 5 weeks, 10 hours, 50 minutes        * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 114/705 123/120 153/7715 226/30 227/114 229/110       SEEN-BY: 229/111 112 113 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 292/854 298/25       SEEN-BY: 305/3 317/3 320/219 396/45       PATH: 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca