Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    EARTH    |    Uhh, that 3rd rock from the sun?    |    8,931 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,821 of 8,931    |
|    ScienceDaily to All    |
|    How neuroimaging can be better utilized     |
|    14 Mar 23 22:30:30    |
      MSGID: 1:317/3 641149f1       PID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08        How neuroimaging can be better utilized to yield diagnostic information       about individuals                Date:        March 14, 2023        Source:        Dartmouth College        Summary:        Since the development of functional magnetic resonance imaging        in the 1990s, the reliance on neuroimaging has skyrocketed as        researchers investigate how fMRI data from the brain at rest,        and anatomical brain structure itself, can be used to predict        individual traits, such as depression, cognitive decline, and brain        disorders. But how reliable brain imaging is for detecting traits        has been a subject of wide debate.               Researchers now report that stronger links between brain measures        and traits can be obtained when state-of-the-art pattern recognition        (or 'machine learning') algorithms are utilized, which can garner        high- powered results from moderate sample sizes.                      Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email       FULL STORY       ==========================================================================       Since the development of functional magnetic resonance imaging in the       1990s, the reliance on neuroimaging has skyrocketed as researchers       investigate how fMRI data from the brain at rest, and anatomical brain       structure itself, can be used to predict individual traits, such as       depression, cognitive decline, and brain disorders.                     ==========================================================================       Brain imaging has the potential to reveal the neural underpinnings of       many traits, from disorders like depression and chronic widespread pain       to why one person has a better memory than another, and why some people's       memories are resilient as they age. But how reliable brain imaging is       for detecting traits has been a subject of wide debate.              Prior research on brain-wide associated studies (termed 'BWAS') has       shown that links between brain function and structure and traits are       so weak that thousands of participants are needed to detect replicable       effects. Research of this scale requires millions of dollars in investment       in each study, limiting which traits and brain disorders can be studied.              However, according to a new commentary published in Nature, stronger links       between brain measures and traits can be obtained when state-of-the-art       pattern recognition (or 'machine learning') algorithms are utilized,       which can garner high-powered results from moderate sample sizes.              In their article, researchers from Dartmouth and University Medicine       Essen provide a response to an earlier analysis of brain-wide       association studies led by Scott Marek at Washington University School       of Medicine in St. Louis, Brenden Tervo-Clemmens at Massachusetts General       Hospital/Harvard Medical School, and colleagues. The earlier study found       very weak associations across a range of traits in several large brain       imaging studies, concluding that thousands of participants would be       needed to detect these associations.              The new article explains that the very weak effects found in the earlier       paper do not apply to all brain images and all traits, but rather are       limited to specific cases. It outlines how fMRI data from hundreds of       participants, as opposed to thousands, can be better leveraged to yield       important diagnostic information about individuals.              One key to stronger associations between brain images and traits such       as memory and intelligence is the use of state-of-the-art pattern       recognition algorithms.              "Given that there's virtually no mental function performed entirely by       one area of the brain, we recommend using pattern recognition to develop       models of how multiple brain areas contribute to predicting traits,       rather than testing brain areas individually," says senior author Tor       Wager, the Diana L. Taylor Distinguished Professor of Psychological and       Brain Sciences and director of the Brain Imaging Center at Dartmouth.              "If models of multiple brain areas working together rather than in       isolation are applied, this provides for a much more powerful approach       in neuroimaging studies, yielding predictive effects that are four times       larger than when testing brain areas in isolation," says lead author       Tamas Spisak, head of the Predictive Neuroimaging Lab at the Institute of       Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology at University       Medicine Essen.              However, not all pattern recognition algorithms are equal and finding the       algorithms that work best for specific types of brain imaging data is       an active area of research. The earlier paper by Marek, Tervo-Clemmens       et al. also tested whether pattern recognition can be used to predict       traits from brain images, but Spisak and colleagues found that the       algorithm they used is suboptimal.              When the researchers applied a more powerful algorithm, the effects       got even larger and reliable associations could be detected in much       smaller samples.              "When you do the power calculations on how many participants are needed       to detect replicable effects, the number drops to below 500 people,"       Spisak says.              "This opens the field to studies of many traits and clinical conditions       for which obtaining thousands of patients is not possible, including       rare brain disorders," says co-author Ulrike Bingel at University       Medicine Essen, who is the head of the University Centre for Pain       Medicine. "Identifying markers, including those involving the central       nervous system, are urgently needed, as they are critical to improve       diagnostics and individually tailored treatment approaches. We       need to move towards a personalized medicine approach grounded in       neuroscience. The potential for multivariate BWAS to move us towards this       goal should not be underestimated." The team explains that the weak       associations found in the earlier analysis, particularly through brain       images, were collected while people were simply resting in the scanner,       rather than performing tasks. But fMRI can also capture brain activity       linked to specific moment-by-moment thoughts and experiences.              Wager believes that linking brain patterns to these experiences may be a       key to understanding and predicting differences among individuals. "One       of the challenges associated with using brain imaging to predict traits       is that many traits aren't stable or reliable. If we use brain imaging to       focus on studying mental states and experiences, such as pain, empathy,       and drug craving, the effects can be much larger and more reliable,"       says Wager. "The key is finding the right task to capture the state."       "For example, showing images of drugs to people with substance use       disorders can elicit drug cravings, according to an earlier study       revealing a neuromarker for cravings," says Wager.              "Identifying which approaches to understanding the brain and mind are       most likely to succeed is important, as this affects how stakeholders       view and ultimately fund translational research in neuroimaging," says       Bingel. "Finding the limitations and working together to overcome them       is key to developing new ways of diagnosing and caring for patients with       brain and mental health disorders."        * RELATED_TOPICS        o Health_&_Medicine        # Brain_Tumor # Medical_Devices # Nervous_System        o Mind_&_Brain        # Brain_Injury # Brain-Computer_Interfaces # Intelligence        o Matter_&_Energy        # Medical_Technology # Biochemistry # Ultrasound        * RELATED_TERMS        o Functional_neuroimaging o Brain_damage o        Positron_emission_tomography o Thalamus o        Magnetic_resonance_imaging o Alpha_wave o Brain o Amygdala              ==========================================================================       Story Source: Materials provided by Dartmouth_College. Original written       by Amy Olson. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.                     ==========================================================================       Journal Reference:        1. Brenden Tervo-Clemmens, Scott Marek, Roselyne J. Chauvin, Andrew        N. Van,        Benjamin P. Kay, Timothy O. Laumann, Wesley K. Thompson, Thomas E.               Nichols, B. T. Thomas Yeo, Deanna M. Barch, Beatriz Luna, Damien        A. Fair, Nico U. F. Dosenbach. Reply to: Multivariate BWAS can be        replicable with moderate sample sizes. Nature, 2023; 615 (7951):        E8 DOI: 10.1038/s41586- 023-05746-w       ==========================================================================              Link to news story:       https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/03/230314205337.htm              --- up 1 year, 2 weeks, 1 day, 10 hours, 50 minutes        * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 114/705 123/120 153/7715 226/30 227/114 229/110       SEEN-BY: 229/111 112 113 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 292/854 298/25       SEEN-BY: 305/3 317/3 320/219 396/45       PATH: 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca