Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    EARTH    |    Uhh, that 3rd rock from the sun?    |    8,931 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,452 of 8,931    |
|    ScienceDaily to All    |
|    Climate change may cut US forest invento    |
|    01 Feb 23 21:30:24    |
      MSGID: 1:317/3 63db3c74       PID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2019-01-08        Climate change may cut US forest inventory by a fifth this century                      Date:        February 1, 2023        Source:        North Carolina State University        Summary:        A study found that under more severe climate warming scenarios,        the inventory of trees used for timber in the continental United        States could decline by as much as 23% by 2100. The largest        inventory losses would occur in two of the leading timber regions        in the U.S., which are both in the South.                      Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email       FULL STORY       ==========================================================================       A study led by a North Carolina State University researcher found that       under more severe climate warming scenarios, the inventory of trees used       for timber in the continental United States could decline by as much       as 23% by 2100. The largest inventory losses would occur in two of the       leading timber regions in the U.S., which are both in the South.                     ==========================================================================       Researchers say their findings show modest impacts on forest product       prices through the end of the century, but suggest bigger impacts in       terms of storing carbon in U.S. forests. Two-thirds of U.S. forests are       classified as timberlands.              "We already see some inventory decline at baseline in our analysis, but       relative to that, you could lose, additionally, as much as 23% of the U.S.              forest inventory," said the study's lead author Justin Baker, associate       professor of forestry and environmental resources at North Carolina State       University. "That's a pretty dramatic change in standing forests."       In the study, which is published in Forest Policy and Economics,       researchers used computer modeling to project how 94 individual tree       species in the continental United States will grow under six climate       warming scenarios through 2100. They also considered the impact of two       different economic scenarios on demand growth for forestry products. The       researchers compared their outcomes for forest inventory, harvest, prices       and carbon sequestration to scenarios with no climate change. Researchers       said their methods could provide a more nuanced picture of the future       forest sector under high-impact climate change scenarios compared to       other models.              "Many past studies show a pretty optimistic picture for forests under       climate change because they see a big boost in forest growth from       additional carbon dioxide in the atmosphere," Baker said. "The effect       that carbon dioxide has on photosynthesis in some of those models tends       to outweigh the losses you see from precipitation and temperature induced       changes in forest productivity and tree mortality. We have a model that       is specific to individual tree species, and that allows us to better       understand how climate factors influence growth rates and mortality."       Researchers found that in certain regions trees would grow more slowly       in higher temperatures, and die faster. Combined with increasing harvest       levels and greater development pressures, that led to declines in the       total tree inventory. They projected the largest losses would be in the       Southeast and South-Central regions, which are two of the three most       productive timber supply regions in the U.S. Those regions could see tree       inventories shrink by as much as 40% by 2095 compared to one of their       baseline scenarios. Due to declines in pine products, the researchers       projected softwood lumber prices could increase as much as 32% by 2050.              "We found pretty high levels of sensitivity to warming and precipitation       changes for productive pine species in the South, especially when climate       change is combined with high forest product demand growth," Baker said.              However, the researchers projected gains in tree supplies in the Rocky       Mountain and Pacific Southwest regions, driven by higher rates of death       of certain trees that lead to larger harvests initially, followed by       the growth of more heat- tolerant species.              "These are regions losing a lot of inventory right now due to pests and       fire disturbance," Baker said. "What you're seeing is a higher level       of replacement with climate adaptive species like juniper, which are       more tolerant to future growing conditions." Combining the effects       from all the regions, researchers projected total losses of U.S. tree       inventory of 3 to 23% compared to baseline. They projected losses in       carbon sequestration in most scenarios, and estimated the value of lost       carbon stored in U.S. forests up to $5.5 billion per year.              They found the economic impact of climate change on the overall       U.S. forest products industry value could range from a loss of as much as       $2.6 billion per year -- representing 2.5% of the value of the industry --       or a gain in value of more than $200 million per year.              "We saw that the markets could be more resilient than the forests       themselves," Baker said. "Your market effects may seem modest in terms of       the effect it has on the consumers and producers, but those impacts are       small compared to the carbon sequestration value that forests provide       on an annual basis." Researchers say more studies are needed to bring       the future of U.S. forestry into sharper focus.              "We don't know a lot about how disturbance-related mortality or loss       in tree productivity is going to bear out across the landscape as       temperatures get warmer," Baker said. "We did our best to address       a couple pieces of the puzzle with temperature and precipitation       changes, and interactions between climate and market demand, but a       lot more work needs to be done to get a good handle on climate change       and forestry." The study, "Projecting U.S. Forest Management, Market,       and Carbon Sequestration Responses to a High-Impact Climate Scenario,"       was published online in Forest Policy and Economics.Co-authors included       George Van Houtven, Jennifer Phelan, Gregory Latta, Christopher M. Clark,       Kemen Austin, Olakunle Sodiya, Sara B.              Ohrel, John Buckley, Lauren E. Gentile and Jeremy Martinich. The study       was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under contract No.              68HERH19D0030. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those       of the authors alone and do not necessarily state or reflect those of       the EPA, and no official endorsement should be inferred.               * RELATED_TOPICS        o Plants_&_Animals        # Trees # Nature # Endangered_Animals        o Earth_&_Climate        # Forest # Global_Warming # Climate        o Science_&_Society        # Environmental_Policies # Resource_Shortage #        Ocean_Policy        * RELATED_TERMS        o Logging o Taiga o Forestry o Climate_change_mitigation o        Consensus_of_scientists_regarding_global_warming o Climate o        Conifers o Global_warming_controversy              ==========================================================================       Story Source: Materials provided       by North_Carolina_State_University. Original written by Laura       Oleniacz. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.                     ==========================================================================       Journal Reference:        1. Justin S. Baker, George Van Houtven, Jennifer Phelan, Gregory Latta,        Christopher M. Clark, Kemen G. Austin, Olakunle E. Sodiya,        Sara B. Ohrel, John Buckley, Lauren E. Gentile, Jeremy        Martinich. Projecting U.S. forest management, market,        and carbon sequestration responses to a high-impact climate        scenario. Forest Policy and Economics, 2023; 147: 102898 DOI:        10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102898       ==========================================================================              Link to news story:       https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/02/230201134216.htm              --- up 48 weeks, 2 days, 10 hours, 50 minutes        * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 114/705 123/120 153/7715 226/30 227/114 229/110       SEEN-BY: 229/111 112 113 114 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 292/854       SEEN-BY: 298/25 305/3 317/3 320/219 396/45       PATH: 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca