Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DOORGAMES    |    BBS Doorgames and discussions    |    1,554 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,523 of 1,554    |
|    Mike Powell to Stephen Hurd    |
|    Re: Kannons and Katapults    |
|    08 Dec 25 09:10:56    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 842.f_doors@1:2320/105 2d9c15ba       REPLY: 86.fido-doorgame@1:103/1 2d9b1137       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed       NOTE: PICO (Nano)        Re: Re: Kannons and Katapults        By: Stephen Hurd to Mike Powell on Sun Dec 07 2025 19:52:01               > Re: Re: Kannons and Katapults        > By: Mike Powell to STEPHEN HURD on Sun Dec 07 2025 11:13 am        >         > > I have it set up to be accessible via two ports. The primary allows folk        > > who have a terminal program capable of RAW mode to call in without the        > > double-CR while also being able to do things like download a QWK packet.        >         > To be clear, it's a CR LF, not a double-CR... but a lot of old software will        >                I am a little leary to blame "old software" when the software itself has no        issue interpreting the tap of the enter key as "one" return... CR or LF or        whatever. It seems more like a case of syncterm, etc., sending an extra        character when in telnet mode that older software -- i.e. most BBS software        that isn't Synchronet or Mystic -- doesn't know what to do with.              That might be semantics but I it is odd that using an older terminal program       over a telnet connection (with something like VMODEM) doesn't cause this,        which makes me suspect it is the modern BBS terminal programs that have        changed something. I am sure the answer is "cause telnet protocol" but since       we are using these terminal programs to telnet into BBSes and not old VAX        or mainframe machines, I have to wonder who thought that was necessary.       --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux        * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/10 37 104/119 105/81 106/201 114/10 120/302       SEEN-BY: 120/616 123/130 128/187 129/14 215 305 142/104 799 153/757       SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 50 110 700 203/0 218/700 840 220/20 30       SEEN-BY: 220/90 221/1 6 360 226/18 30 44 50 227/114 229/110 112 134       SEEN-BY: 229/200 206 307 310 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/5832       SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/5003 291/111 301/1 320/119 219 319 2119 322/757       SEEN-BY: 322/762 325/304 326/101 335/364 341/66 342/19 200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 423/81 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5020/400       SEEN-BY: 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 154/10 221/6 1 320/219 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca