Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,770 of 4,105    |
|    Lee Lofaso to Bill McGarrity    |
|    Free College Tuition    |
|    15 Feb 16 21:34:37    |
      Hello Bill,               LL>>>> "Free college for everyone is a bad idea. But it is not        LL>>>> exactly the type of thing that would make him similar to        LL>>>> Stalin and Castro."               SW>> Yes Free College is a bad idea. Who get's employer preference? Free        SW>> college students or paid? We need to lower student debt not give out        SW>> more handouts. Let's just let the students stay home and just send them        SW>> the degree they want. I have a hard time understanding what motivates        SW>> young people these days. I never got a damn thing when I was young. I        SW>> had to earn everything! That's my 2 cents anyway. ;-)               BM> Free tuition is not a new thing. From 1971 to 1974 I recieved free       tuition        BM> from CCNY and it certainly wasn't a community college. Regarding your        BM> employer prefernce, why not let merit determine that factor. Whether free        BM> or paid, the level of education is still required to attend and succeed.        BM> So, to me at least, if a student receives free education and graduates       with        BM> a 4.0 where a student who pays, taking the same courses, gets a 2.4, which        BM> one would you        BM> choose?              An employer would choose to hire an employee who graduated from an       accredited school rather than from a school that was not accredited.              The issue is not really whether the student had paid for his/her       tuition or somebody else (taxpayers) had paid for his/her tuition.       The issue for the employer is whether the potential employee is       qualified or not qualified to do the job.               BM> I understand the motivation issue as well. Success is not guaranteed and        BM> that should be stressed, but the path to success should be and let        BM> the student prove him/herself.              A graduate of an accredited institution of higher learning has       already proven himself/herself, regardless of who had paid the       cost of his/her tuition. As such, the matter of who paid the       tuition should not be a factor, or an issue of concern, of the       employer.              All employees have to constantly prove themselves to their       employers, throughout their careers, regardless of their education.       That much should be obvious.              --Lee              --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb        * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca