Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,733 of 4,105    |
|    alexander koryagin to BOB ACKLEY    |
|    Re: obamas gun fight    |
|    17 Jan 16 19:26:50    |
      Hi, Bob Ackley!       I read your message from 15.01.2016 11:34               TR>>>>> American citizens the right to keep and bear arms was to keep        TR>>>>> an armed citizenry able to resist and overthrow a tyrannical        TR>>>>> government.        ak>>>> Small arms is useless for that purpose.        TR>>> What makes you think all we've got is `small arms'?        ak>> If the army use tanks, bombers, satellite, drones, spying        ak>> equipment where can buy it? If you catch a tank it will be        ak>> destroyed by a bomber withing minutes.               BA> Tanks and bombers are pretty much useless in an urban environment -        BA> unless the government wants to alienate the rest of the people.        BA> They're pretty much useless in jungles and forests, too. We should        BA> have learned that in Vietnam and you should have learn ed it in        BA> Afghanistan.              It is not correct. The Afghan and Vietnam rebel success has some sense        only when they receive multi-billion military help and other high-tech        equipment for fighting planes, tanks etc. The success of Taliban        fighters now is due to they have in their hands "help" originated both        from the USA and the USSR. ;)               BA> Small arms, however, are very useful in such an environment. So are        BA> knives and garrots.              Garrot? Is it an arm, too?               |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca