Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,518 of 4,105    |
|    Lee Lofaso to BOB KLAHN    |
|    Death Wish    |
|    19 Nov 14 23:50:23    |
      Hello Bob,               LL>> Brittany Maynard was terminally ill, given only a few        LL>> short months to live, and was in much pain and suffering.        LL>> She ended her life in Oregon, one of five states in the        LL>> US that allows doctors to help assist the terminally        LL>> ill of sound mind to do so.               LL>> Our society chooses to condem people who decide to end        LL>> their own lives, and forbids doctors and other health care        LL>> workers to help them do it. Even though five states have               LL>> When it becomes an impossibility, or undue hardship, to        LL>> maintain a quality of life worth living, then an individual        LL>> should have an absolute right to end his/her own life.               BK> This argument has been going on a very long time. Long ago I        BK> read a report on it, and it said there is no such thing as pain        BK> that can't be controlled. They gave England as an example, where        BK> the question didn't even come up.              Do fish feel pain? PETA argued that fish do in fact       feel pain, and gave a tutorial on how fishermen should       go about catching and storing their fish. PETA has       also argued that Cajuns are cruel because we boil our       crawfish alive. On that, Cajuns found allies from       lobster fishermen in Maine ...              Each individual has his/her own tolerance for pain.       Different thresholds, or levels, of pain. In some cases       it is only a state of mind, rather than anything physical.       In other cases, what would be excruciating pain can be       mentally blocked out by some people. All without the       use of drugs.              In most cases, when a person is in a significant amount       of pain, he/she needs medication in order to continue       functioning in a normal way. And in some cases, simply       to continue to exist.              A cancer patient, in his/her last stages of life, might be       totally dependent on morphine - just to get through the       day. He/she may or may not even be aware of his/her own       surroundings. But without the morphine, that individual       would be in so much pain and suffering that it would be       absolute torture to endure.               BK> You see, in England they can give heroin to patients in extreme        BK> pain. That is a big difference.              We give morphine to those we deem in need. And we justify       it on the same grounds as do those in England who give heroin       to patients.               BK> I don't know if it's true that there is no such thing as pain        BK> that can't be alleviated, but I do know there is pain that can        BK> be alleviated, but the drugs that do it are either illegal, or        BK> so controlled you can't give them enough.              A few decades ago we had a problem in America with heroin       addicts. Nobody cared about them, as they were junkies who       lived in our ghettoes. The nation's poor. The trash of       society.              Flash forward to a few short years ago. Painkillers, such       as oxy-contin, were prescribed by doctors nationwide, patients       being told those drugs were not addictive. Less than one percent       of those who took those drugs would get hooked on them, is what       people were told by doctors. And what happened? Three to six       months later, those patients were asking their doctors where       they could get some more of those pills. Well, the doctor       had done his job, and the prescription had run out, so folks       had to find another source. So who did they turn do?              The Pusher Man.              And now today's addicts are the middle class. The boy       next door. The man across the street. The secretary at       your office. All once hooked on painkillers prescribed       by their doctors, now hooked on heroin. Only today's       heroin is far more deadly than yesterday's stash.               BK> Then there's the fear of making terminal patients drug addicts.              It is not just terminal patients who are drug addicts.       Rush Limbaugh was addicted to painkillers he got legally.       How he got so many of them is beyond me. But then, maybe       he was in a great deal of pain and being as big as he is       well he probably needed them.               BK> The other fear is, the drugs will shorten the patient's life.              Yeah. That's like saying pot will stunt your growth.       Nobody on painkillers/heroin is going to believe that.               BK> Chose, 6 weeks of extreme pain, or 4 weeks free from pain. Not hard by my        BK> thinking.              Hit me, man! Hit me! I wanna feel good hoo ha!               LL>> What about a baby born without a brain? Would it be okay        LL>> for a doctor or a nurse to off the baby? I mean, the baby               BK> An anacelephic baby doesn't live long and doesn't suffer.              Scientists have successfully cloned frogs without a brain.       In theory, the same could be done with humans. Would cloning       humans for body parts be ethical? I doubt it. Which is why       we should clone neandertals instead.              --Lee              --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb        * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca