Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,459 of 4,105    |
|    Roy Witt to Bill McGarrity    |
|    WWIII    |
|    18 Aug 14 19:05:05    |
      Greetings Bill!               BK>>> The better question would be, should a country not kill thousand        BK>>> of their own people as the price for freeing millions from        BK>>> slavery?               RW>>> As long as they're Yankees, no.               BM>> Last I heard it was Yankees: 1 the South: 0               RW>> Ask yourself, how many more Yanks died than Rebels?               RW>> Dead Yanks 596,670: South 490,309               RW>> Served: Yanks 1,532,278, South 591,810 i.e. a little under 3:1               RW>> Eligible, but ran off to Canada: Yanks: 2,430,294, South: none               BM> All your #'s can be compared to the game of baseball where one        BM> pitcher gives up 15 hits in a game yet still walks away with the        BM> victory. It's the final score that counts.              I concur with the former, but the final score has no meaning when the       'battle' had so many shining moments. Take the battles fought in the north       before the tide of turned when the North put more people on the       battlefield than the South.               RW>> Even with close to total conscription, the South could not match the        RW>> North's numerical strength. Southerners also stood a significantly        RW>> greater chance of being killed, wounded, or captured, especially if        RW>> they were old men, women and teenage civilians.               BM> Shit happens...              Yanks die.               RW>>> PS - The Civil War wasn't about slavery...but it sure turned out to        RW>>> be a crutch for y'all.               BM>> Don't you mean "totally" about slavery?        ay withRW>> Get yer historicathe l facts straight: The Northern and        ay withRW>> Southern               BM> sections              Weren't sections like a railroad construction crew.               RW>> of the United States developed along different lines. The South        RW>> remained a predominantly agrarian economy while the North became        RW>> more and more industrialized. Different social cultures and        RW>> political beliefs developed.               RW>> All of this led to disagreements on issues such as taxes, tariffs        RW>> and internal improvements as well as states rights versus federal        RW>> rights.               RW>> Slavery was an excuse to make war by the Yanks 'after the war        RW>> started'...               BM>> The basis behind all southern contention was how the slave trade        BM>> centered around states rights, economic freedoms and slavery itself.               RW>> Wrong, see above.               BM> Did I not explain all that in my original post (the one where you        BM> edited out the economic reasoning).              Economics was the reason for the war, not slavery, Moot point.               BM> You play the game like FauxEntertainment...              It's a wonder you havn't broken that mirror with all of your faux claims       to victory.               BM> edit the shit out of a story to make them seem intelligent.              Like you do, not likely.               BM>> Slavery. Now unless you feel men can be owned by another, this is        BM>> fairly self explainatory.               RW>> Moron.               BM> So you own slaves Roy?              Why would I, I don't own any cotton plantations. But owning slaves       wouldn't be out of the question if I did, in 1860.               BM>> The good old boys               RW>> aka Democrats, no Southerun Democrats, who are now against all that        RW>> preaching they did back then.               BM> And the baton was passed to the southern Republicans of today.              Not really. They had to overcome the morons who led them down this path.               BM> Actually, ALL republicans fit that image.              The Republacans that will be sitting in the Senate next year and the other       one who will be living in the WH in 2016.               Have a day!              PS - I'm not a Republican...FYI                      R\%/itt - K5RXT              --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012       --- D'Bridge 3.99        * Origin: The Master Baiter Playground for Morons (1:387/22)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca