On 04-17-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to TIM RICHARDSON:   
      
   -=> TIM RICHARDSON wrote to BILL MCGARRITY <=-   
      
      
   BM>Two things and I'll not be bothering you again.   
      
      
   BM>Firstly, it was not I who posted or as your say "dragged" you into this   
   BM>echo, it was Roy.  Talk to him.   
      
      
   I talked to Klahn. And I talked to you as well.   
      
      
   BM>Secondly, I don't care what you believe in or what you do or how you do   
   BM>it.   
      
      
   You must care; you keep harping on various subjects I've posted up facts on,   
   and out and out accused *me* of participating in abortions, in a far stretch   
   of the truth and facts that only made you look silly.   
      
      
   You dragged three topics through three different echoes, tried to `get over'   
   on me in all three topics, made false accusations aimed at me in two (you   
   accused *me* of participating in abortions when you couldn't get around the   
   fact that I was issuing medications as per a doctors' instructions and   
   prescription. You out and out accused me of homosexuality when you couldn't   
   come up with any facts that showed homosexual activity to be anything other   
   than the sick, disgusting activity that it is, not to mention medically   
   dangerous as well. And you also made yourself out a fool in the `climate   
   change-nee-global warming discussion, being reduced to insults, curses, and   
   foolishness in that topic as well).   
      
      
   BM>To me you're a non-entity just as I maybe to you, so let's cut the   
   BM>bullshit and just say fuck you to each other and leave it at that.   
      
      
   *You're* saying "fuck you"...   
      
      
   But the topics haven't gone away. They're still there.   
      
      
   By the way...on the subject of `abortion'?   
      
      
   You and some of your adherents have gotten real pissed when I've brought   
   Kermit Gosnell up and posted some facts on that case.   
      
      
   I'm not surprised. Because the Kermit Gosnell case brought into the spotlight   
   what free usage of abortion on demand with few if any restrictions, can   
   ultimately lead to.   
      
      
   Its almost loudly-embarassing how quickly the Gosnell case has been made to   
   `disappear' from the news cycles. A glance at the photos (and not all of the   
   photos were on public display) of his atrocities is strong testiment of the   
   horrific side of the abortion issue. Of COURSE no politician or `activist   
   mouth' like Pelosi or Fluke would want to `down-side' of the subject to make   
   the light of day.   
      
      
   Not even Hollywood is touching this. Amazing how quickly `movies' are cranked   
   out when its some issue the leftist movie makers can do a multi-million dollar   
   extravaganza on, make lots of money, and spread false facts and impressions   
   about.   
      
      
   But an issue that would REALLY grab the public eye, really graphic....cue the   
   crickets!   
      
      
   Not to worry....some private group are even now gathering the money and   
   evidence to make a movie on the Gosnell case.   
      
      
   There are actually very few restrictions in most places around the country as   
   to how far into a pregnancy an abortion is proper....the sanitary onditions   
   under which abortions are performed...inspections of facilities...etc etc.   
      
      
   The abortion issue has been the left's pet project for several decades, now.   
   And of course, a case like the Kermit Gosnell horrors cannot be allowed to be   
   kept in the public eye for too long a period. It would tend to graphicly   
   illustrate the realities of abortion: infanticide.   
      
      
   If I were a Tea Party candidate for office in a district where a democrat who   
   strongly supported abortion, every time the democrat's buses with their   
   `bussed-in' supporters arrived at a campaign stop to hold a rally, they'd be   
   greeted with billboards plastered with billboard-sized photos of Gosnell's   
   handiwork!   
      
      
   No....you don't have to talk to me anymore. And you don't get me to leave off,   
   just because you can't discuss any issue without resorting to sandbox   
   language, either.   
      
      
   I'm glad I became a `non-entity' to you. Thats actually an admission of defeat   
   on your part.   
      
      
   BM>Have a good live   
      
      
   Ditto.   
      
      
      
   ---   
   *Durango b301 #PE*    
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)