>> But now you have been taught that the tax increase was only   
   >> a part of that supposed "165 billion."  I even explained   
   >> exactly what years saw a tax increase from the 1983 law,   
   >> and what years saw NO increase over the 1977 Carter tax   
   >> increases that were already slated to go into effect.  If   
   >> you had just paid attention, you would have learned   
   >> something.   
      
   > Now you are playing a word game, pretending a tax increase today   
   > doesn't count if it was already schedualed for 5 years from now.   
      
   If you had actually read what I said, and if you had even a low level of   
   understanding of the English language, you would realize I said the opposite.   
   Did you not read it, or did you not understand?  There is no third option   
   other than your complete dishonesty.   
      
   I pointed out to you weeks ago which three years actually saw a tax increase   
   due to the 1983 law.  You have yet to show any sign that you read it, let   
   alone understood it, let alone being able to honestly admit it.   
      
      
   --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1   
    * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)