RE: You posting in 2098 and 1985 and in my echo and your echo   
    etc.   
      
    You have double posted several messages in this echo. If you   
    can't get that right don't bitch about what your BBS says about   
    when you posted.   
      
   >>>> That was not a ruling. That was advice to Richardson.   
      
   >>> It was your official interpretation of the rule, and it   
   >>> makes the rule moot.   
      
   >> No, it was not. There is no rule against anyone reading the   
   >> echo, that was advice to stop doing so.   
      
    EC> As usual, you pretend to miss the point.  You ruled that if   
    EC> anyone feels they are being provoked in your echo they   
    EC> should react by not reading the provocation.  That makes   
    EC> Peter's provocation rule moot, just as it makes the rule   
    EC> about personal attacks moot.  This was already explained   
    EC> more thoroughly. You just ignored it.  Nothing new.   
      
    EC> --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1   
    EC>  * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)   
      
   BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn   
      
   --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]   
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)