Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,191 of 4,105    |
|    Earl Croasmun to Bob Klahn    |
|    Social Security Going Bro    |
|    13 Nov 13 00:11:08    |
      >> I even specified WHICH YEARS actually saw the accelerated       >> tax increases. Specifically, the 1985 rate increase got       >> moved up to 1984, the already-passed increases for 1985-87       >> remained the same, part of the already-passed 1990 increase       >> got moved up to 1988, and the already-passed increases from       >> 1990 to 2030 remained the same. There were only three       >> years that saw higher rates than if the act had not been       >> passed.              > As I pointed out, the accelerated tax increases accounted for,       > by the Greenspan commission's own report, only about 25% of the       > increased revenue.              You started off talking about the tax increase. I am the one who had to       explain to you that the law made a variety of changes apart from just the rate       increases that you wanted to talk about. You wanted to attribute all of the       amount to the higher tax rates. That was a couple of months ago. It is good       that you are starting to change your story, even if you aren't willing to do       it openly.                     --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1        * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca