home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   DEBATE      Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat      4,105 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,189 of 4,105   
   TIM RICHARDSON to BOB KLAHN   
   Stay home!   
   11 Nov 13 09:39:00   
   
   On 11-10-13, BOB KLAHN said to TIM RICHARDSON:   
      
      
      
   BK>>Yet you don't challenge others who attack the service of others.   
      
      
   TR> You're a liar!   
      
      
      
   BK>No, I told the truth.   
      
      
   No, you didn't. You lied. Both you AND your little sock puppet Sauer regularly   
   attacked Richard Helm over his serevice in the Marine Corp. You both did so   
   deliberately, and knowing full well that most of what you said to him   
   demeaning his military service, was pure bullshit. You did it only to insult   
   and belittle him. Which makes you as big a piece of shit as Otto Sauer ever   
   was. Bigger, in fact, as you are a bit more intelligent than Sauer (although   
   not by much).   
      
      
   TR> Or were you asleep all those years Sauer not   
   TR> only attacked the service of others, but lied about his own?   
      
      
   BK>What Sauer did or did not do doesn't dispute anything about what   
   BK>I said.   
      
      
   It certainly does. You yourself were here when Sauer was attacking both   
   Richard Helm and I, and Stan Hardegree over our military service, and telling   
   some of the outrageous lies he told about his own time in the Air Force (all   
   65 days of it). Lies you knew (and know)full well could not possibly be true.   
      
      
   You not only remained silent on his `...attack the service if others.', you   
   even lent support to him by pretending his stupid claims were within the realm   
   of possibility, when you HAD to know it was impossible for his claims to be   
   true.   
      
      
   So you have no room to speak of anyones' `...don't challenge others who attack   
   the service of others'. In fact...you yourself have engaged in it right along   
   with your little turd of a sock puppet, Sauer.   
      
      
   BM>>>Ban me from this echo if you'd like, I really don't care.   
      
      
   TR>> Note to Earl: Please do not ban this idiot. He might be   
   TR>> almost as much fun to bait as Klahn is.   
      
      
   BK>>Which is all you have going for you as you deteriorate.   
      
      
   TR> `Deteriorate'? I'm doing just fine.   
      
      
   BK>No, you are not. You are going hostile at the slightest   
   BK>perceived provocation.   
      
      
   Not at all. I enjoy baiting you. You're as big a piece of shit as Sauer and   
   Chirnside were.   
      
      
   BK>You see just disagreeing with you as provocation.   
      
      
   You don't just `disagree', you do so in an insulting, demeaning manner. You   
   are not content to excange views or offer opposing opinions, you must disagree   
   in a way in which you land a sneaky little put down aimed at the person you   
   are replying to.   
      
      
   BK>You spew bigotry then protest that it didn't happen   
   BK>when you are called on it, then you admit that's exactly what   
   BK>you did.   
      
      
   One of your favorite accusations is to wave the `bigotry' word, in an attempt   
   to put the person you aim it at on the defensive. And it piss's you off   
   because I'm not intimidated into silence on a subject matter you use the `B'   
   word to try to silence me on.   
      
      
   BM>>>Enjoy your sandbox...   
      
      
   TR>> If you don't want to get a face-full of sand...don't come   
   TR>> in here and start throwing sand at other people to begin   
   TR>> with.   
      
      
   BK>You truly are stupid. I deselected this echo, didn't even   
   BK>download it in my packet, and you got so desperate you posted in   
   BK>the Debate echo.   
      
      
   The fact that you `de'select this echo or read it, is of little or no concern   
   of mine. I mention your name in posts whenever and wherever I feel like it. If   
   you don't like it, don't read this echo, and add my name to your `twit'   
   filter. That way, not only will you not see any messages with my name in the   
   `to' or `from' fields...you won't know *what* we're talking about in this   
   echo. Viola! your problem goes away of its own accord!   
      
      
   BK>Tell you what, not only will I not bother with your stupidity,   
   BK>but I'll only read a bit more of Earl's lies and displays of his   
   BK>incompetence as an economist then I'll deselect it again. This   
   BK>time, don't bother me again.   
      
      
   De-select to your heart's content, asshole. The sooner the better. With you   
   gone, maybe we can have some decent conversations around here. This is NOT any   
   sort of agreement on my part to never to speak of, insult, or accuse you, any   
   time I please. I will continue to do so without hesitation. If you don't like   
   it....tough!   
      
      
      
      
   ---   
   *Durango b301 #PE*    
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca