>>> I was laughing about Klahn echoing Krugman.  He agrees, and   
   >>> quibbles about the timing of his post.  I don't care if it   
      
   >> Which is a lie. I refuted his claim I took two weeks.   
      
    EC> Once again Bobzo calls a true statement a "lie."  You might   
      
    Once again Earlie calls a lie a true statement.   
      
    EC> think that he is being loose with his word choice, but he   
    EC> might also be trying to pretend that he does not know what   
    EC> the word "lie" means.  He has done so in the past.   
      
    Earl lies again.   
      
    EC> I indicated when Krugman's column came out.  I indicated   
    EC> when Bobzo echoed it into Fidonet.  He misuses the word   
    EC> "lie" AND the word "refuted" AS WELL.   
      
    Earl loves to spin things. I never challenged his claim about   
    when Krugman's column came out, I said I did not agree about me   
    "echoing" Krugman.   
      
    Yet, Earlie keeps going back to the time it came out, and   
    ignores what I really said. I did point out that it came out,   
    here, a couple days before my response.   
      
    Yet, Earlie keeps repeating the lie that I agreed with his claim   
    that I 'echoed' Krugman.   
      
      
      
      
   BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn   
      
   --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]   
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)