Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,000 of 4,105    |
|    Damon A. Getsman to BOB KLAHN    |
|    Ed Snowden's email provider shutting dow    |
|    14 Aug 13 02:31:44    |
       Re: Ed Snowden's email provider shutting down to fight USG pressure        By: BOB KLAHN to DAMON A. GETSMAN on Wed Aug 14 2013 02:23:08               > Damon, that's not allowed in this echo. I believe it's the        > only political discussion echo were personal attacks are not        > allowed.               Thanks. I was out of line with that, I believe I went into that,        but I'll try to not post before I've had enough coffee.               > I doubt Obama ever sees a word about Fidonet. Many years ago        > there were people on Fidonet I am quite sure were watched by the        > Feds, and some of them clearly provoked it. However, it's too        > small and boring for that now.               The whole discussion was sarcastic, actually. At least from my        end; if it wasn't on Lee's end, then I'm glad to have finally located        someone (other than a usenet loon) who is more paranoid than myself. ;)        BTW: On my way out of the Army I was investigated by the Secret        Service. And yeah, I served meritoriously and I have an honorable        discharge, in case you're wondering, as people always are when I bring        that up. So, for whatever it's worth, I'm watched by the feds, so now you        know another.        All in all, though, I agree with you. I'm sure there's at least        one poor sap at the NSA that has to read through Fidonet on a daily or        weekly basis, but no, except perhaps in a numerical statistic regarding        general public opinions, he doesn't see any of that.               > Chilling out a bit wouldn't hurt you.               Yeah. I've been working on that for awhile. You might want to        try the same. I'm only following your lead here in straying off of        allowed topical content in this area right now, btw (as far as this        particular paragraph is concerned). We'd only exchanged a few messages        when you had accused me blatantly of being a racist. A few other folks        piped up at that point and said that it was one of your standard fallbacks        when presented with a viewpoint that you did not share. I'm inclined to        agree. I'm pretty sure my son doesn't think I'm racist, and as much as        his mother hates me, I'm pretty sure she doesn't think I'm racist either.        I'll take their opinions over yours. My son's mother is full-blooded        Kikuyu tribe from Nirobi, Kenya. She's not even African American, she's        straight up African. I was planning on marrying her, and deeply in love        with her. The issues with immigration and bringing her to this country,        especially after my blatant lack of [what is standard] assistance from the        Army in this matter, ended up destroying our relationship after several        years together. In hindsight, it's for the best; it was after my son was        conceived that I realized how deeply her alcoholism went, and the fact        that she believed in corporeal punishment to an extreme that is quite        illegal in most first world countries. I thank the heavens that I was        able to take custody of him (at her request) before he got old enough to        start remembering and truly comprehending what was going on around him.        Anyway, I don't know why I'm typing this crap right now, either.        I guess it's because I like promoting discussion, and I'm suffering the        nocturnal version of what I was that morning that I replied to Lee. I'm        suffering a bit of insomnia right now.        I was a dick, yes. I was, however, and you may not believe what I        say here, trying to promote a little bit of clarity in this discussion        forum. I've found replies that respond to a citation in this manner        responsible for a lot of misperception before, and I point it out every        time I can and have the energy to do so. I will, however, try to do it in        a less confrontational manner next time.        Peace out.              -The opinions expressed are not necessarily an advocation of any of the       aforementioned ideologies, concepts, or actions. We still have the freedom of       speech, for now, and I enjoy using it in a satirical or ficticious manner to       amuse myself-              "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a       revolutionary act." -- George Orwell              --- SBBSecho 2.14-OpenBSD        * Origin: telnet://bismaninfo.hopto.org:8023/ (1:282/1057)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca