Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,660 of 4,105    |
|    Lee Lofaso to BOB KLAHN    |
|    Year of Three Popes    |
|    18 Feb 13 17:01:36    |
      Hello Bob,               LL>> Bob K. is gonna hate me for writing this.        LL>> But he (and others) must be warned.              BK>No, I don't. (he said cursing under his breath)              Not to worry. There has never been a pope named Bob. There       has also never been a pope name Luke. Or a pope named Matthew.       Or a pope named James. Or a pope named Lee. Although that       could change ...              BK>Since the prophesies were not recorded by St Malachy, but in       BK>1595 by Arnold de Wyon, they are likely fakes. Oh, the de       BK>suggests he was French.              There were two lists, not just one. While one of those lists       might indeed be a fake, the other most certainly is not.       However, just because the handwriting is different, and the       writings in multiple languages, does not negate its contents.       Besides, its only the last prophecy that one has to worry       about.              BK>The so called prophesies are very accruate from Celestine II       BK>until 1590, and very inaccurate after that, the evidence is they       BK>are fake.              Others disagree, claiming that all the prophecies are accurate,       although admitting those after 1590 were more obscure. However,       as I mentioned before, it is only the last prophecy that remains       important, as all others have come to pass.              The RCC does not disagree with the list of popes as being       by St. Malachy. What the RCC is trying to dispute is the last       prophecy, which has no number, as it is an addendum to the pope       associated with number 111. How it came about is the list was       held for centuries at a monastery. And then a fire broke out.       The monks saved the list, but the bottom was singed. However,       one of the monks remembered what was written at the bottom       of the manuscript, and so he rewrote St. Malachy's last prophecy       and sewed it back onto the manuscript. Was that a forgery?       If the words were true, what does it matter?              Let's take a look at the final prophecy again -               LL>> "In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church there        LL>> will reign Peter the Roman, who will feed his flock among        LL>> many tribulations; after which the seven-hilled city will        LL>> be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people."        LL>> - St. Malachy, ~1139 AD              Here is my prediction -              If the next pope declares his new papal name as Peter,       the crowd below will make a mad dash for the exits and       millions will die in the stampede ...              --Lee              --- MesNews/1.06.00.00-gb        * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca