-=> DAMON A. GETSMAN wrote to BOB BREED <=-   
      
    DAG>   Re: Re: Assault Weapons Ban   
    DAG>   By: BOB BREED to BOB KLAHN on Fri Feb 08 2013 09:19:00   
      
    > Yesterday some cop up in L.A. went bonkers and killed a couple, then wounded   
    > one cop, killed another. Ex-military who feels he was screwed over by his   
    > fellow cops because he felt one used excessive force and reported him.   
    > Backlash, now his name is smeared and off he goes. The couple he killed was   
    > daughter of his ex-police chief, then his lawyer.  As of this morning he's   
    > still running loose and vows he's not afraid to die.   
      
    DAG>     Wow.  Is that verified?  I thought he was only killing bad cops.   
      
   He's vowed to kill all those that were in on his hearing where he was   
   ismissed.   
   Still at large this morning, but they've had heavy snow in the mountains where   
   they feel he's hiding out.     
      
   Article in today's paper saying the police chief is going to review this case   
   and make sure they did right by firing him.  Not that it will make much   
   difference either way now, he's killed a cop, wounded another - then the couple   
   he killed makes a review kinda pointless.   
      
    DAG> My argument about the whole issue when I still thought that was that   
    DAG> yeah, it's a crime and it's not the way to go about it, but it's   
    DAG> definitely indicative of a problem that needs to be solved within   
    DAG> police departments and any of the other 'Good Ole Boys' Clubs' that   
    DAG> form whenever the members of the organization have power over others   
    DAG> that could purposely or accidentally be misused.  They protect their   
    DAG> own in case they screw up and end up being the one that 'needs   
    DAG> protecting' from their fellow officers.   
    DAG>     Clearly we need citizens' review boards for police departments;   
    DAG> ones that can actually enact disciplinary proceedings, bring up charges   
    DAG> on individuals, and do the 'policing of the police' that they   
    DAG> absolutely refuse to do to themselves.   
    DAG>     However, I digress.  If those people he killed truly were who you   
    DAG> say they were, this guy is an indiscriminately killing piece of shit   
    DAG> who needs to be taken down as soon as humanly possible.   
      
   I wonder if they're even thinking of arresting him at this point?  My guess is   
   he ends up dead.   
      
    DAG> -The opinions expressed are not necessarily an advocation of any of the   
    DAG> aforementioned ideologies, concepts, or actions.  We still have the   
    DAG> freedom of speech, for now, and I enjoy using it in a satirical or   
    DAG> ficticious manner to amuse myself.-   
       
   Guess there's a blog with all pro and con for the guy.  Most of the pro are   
   only to see if he got a bad deal.  Not too many agree with the killings.   
      
      
      
      
       
   --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49   
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)