Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,423 of 4,105    |
|    Lee Lofaso to BOB KLAHN    |
|    Republican Math    |
|    24 Nov 12 23:15:51    |
      Hello Bob,               LL>> Romney's snake oil. His sales pitch was that he was going        LL>> to give everybody a $5 trillion tax cut, and also increase        LL>> military spending by $2 trillion. All without raising        LL>> taxes.               BK>> Bush did it. Of course that doubled the national debt, but so        BK>> what. Deficits don't matter. (Dick Cheney)               LL>> GWB was only doing what we hired him to do. I mean, really.        LL>> Isn't the proper role of government to spend as much of our        LL>> money as possible in the shortest period of time? Think              BK>Not in the shortest possible time, but in the most effective       BK>manner.              The most effective manner would be for the president to declare       martial law and then rule by decree. The manner that is normally       used is very cumbersome and ineffective, the president constantly       having to make deals with the Congress. Even Lyndon Johnson, whose       party also had control of both houses of Congress and the Supreme       Court, had to use strong-arm tactics in order to get needed       legislation passed.              BK>If he had rebuilt infrastructure and educated the young       BK>it would have paid off in spades. Spending on war is pure       BK>economic waste.              We can cut defense spending in half and still have more arms       than the rest of the world combined. But what would happen if       we were to take an isolationist approach, defend ourselves only,       and say the hell with the rest of the world? Would we be safer,       or less safe?               LL>> about it. Bill Clinton left office with a surplus. Within        LL>> eight months of taking office, and one month before the        LL>> terror attacks of 9-11, GWB managed to spend our way into a        LL>> deficit.              BK>The 9-11 attacks were a blip on the economic radar. It was the       BK>follow up wars that brought this country down. Had he not turned       BK>to invading Iraq even that would not have happened.              The Bush tax cuts for the wealthy was the first step that got us       into the fine mess we are in today. It was compounded by the events       of 9-11, which came *after* GWB had squandered the surplus. While       the events of 9-11 were nothing more than "a blip on the economic       radar" there were other factors that did much more damage. Such       as the unfunded leave no child behind act, the unfunded wars in       Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the unfunded prescription drug       program for seniors. How did Americans pay for all that? We didn't.       GWB borrowed those funds against future generations. We could have       our cake and eat it too. Meanwhile, our kids and grandkids won't       get any cake at all, as it will be all gone by the time they grow       up and realize what we did.              BK>Pat Buchanan is wrong about a lot of things, but he was right       BK>about one thing. He said, "Perpetual war destroys democracies".              Buchanan was also right about another thing - we need to make more       babies. Not really sure what his solution is for how to care for those       babies once we are gone. But then, folks who make babies really aren't       concerned about how those babies are going to take care of themselves       when they are actually making those babies ...               LL>> And eight years later, when GWB finally left        LL>> office, this country was so much in debt that it took a        LL>> Democrat to quadruple our spending in order to keep us from        LL>> going into another Great Depression. And now, having won a              BK>Spending went up to almost 25% of GDP under Bush. The deficit       BK>went up to $1.6Trillion under Bush. Obama did not quadruple       BK>that, he didn't increase it much if at all.              Of course spending went up. There was a war going on. Actually,       there were two wars going on. And then Bush lost an American city.       The residents of America's Atlantis had to relocate. Some of them       to a military installation in Utah. Not many black folks in Utah.       Until after Katrina. :)               LL>> second term, that same Democrat wants to do it again, thus        LL>> leading this country to even greater heights than ever        LL>> before...              BK>All he has to do is get unemployment below 5% *real*. That is       BK>also what he absolutely must do.              FDR created projects so people could get back to work.       GWB let God do the work, sending FEMA to clean up the mess.       Obama had a better idea, with his stimulus bill, cash for       clunkers program, free phones for the homeless, and affordable       (i.e. free) health care act. For an encore, I expect Obama to       make everything free, not just healthcare.              --Lee              --- MesNews/1.06.00.00-gb        * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca