->  ...   
   ->    
   -> ->>  Not *exactly*. You have the right to marry someone who appeals   
   -> ->>  to you. To have *exactly* the same rights they would have to   
   -> ->>  have the right to marry someone who appeals to them.   
   ->    
   ->  FS> Not quite!  If the "someone who appeals" to me is a *man* I   
   ->  FS> cannot marry him.   
   ->    
   -> ->>  Since, generally, it's a bad idea for a gay to marry a straight,   
   -> ->>  harmful to the straight person as well as the gay person, it's   
   -> ->>  not a good idea.   
   ->    
   ->  FS> I didn't say it was a good idea.  I merely pointed out that   
   ->  FS> they have exactly the same rights WRT marriage as *I* have.   
   ->    
   ->  Ok, so long as you agree it's a bad idea.   
      
   I assume you mean it's a bed idea for a homosexual to marry a heterosexual.    
   Nevertheless the *option* exists.   
       
   ->  OTOH, until 1965, in many states I did not have the right to   
   ->  marry the woman I did.   
      
   True, and those laws obviously conflicted with the constitution so they've   
   all been over-ruled!    
   --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5   
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 And Still Here. Join Us: www.DocsPl (1:123/140)