Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,158 of 4,105    |
|    BOB KLAHN to RICHARD WEBB    |
|    Neglecting Ron Paul Can Be Bad For Repub    |
|    11 Sep 12 16:40:24    |
       ...              BK>> True. Libertarians have a lot of good points, many of which I       BK>> agree with. Tea Baggers are very narrowly focused, and very wrong       BK>> and very dishonest.               RW> That focus has been imposed from without, many of those        RW> folks, I'm sorry to say have been duped. That's one reason               True, but the "imposed from without" is because they are so        narrowly focused they don't recognize the outside, plus they are        often pre-disposed to the outside influence. Plus they are out        and out lied to and they have so small a knowledge base they        can't see the lies.               RW> why in my old age the more you shout about how much you're        RW> with me and wanting to make my life better the more I        RW> mistrust you. What's your game/ What do you get out of        RW> this? WHo are you really? Even more important, who or        RW> what is behidn you?               Very valid questions, which won't get answered, and they will        just write you off as a trivial nuisance. Me also.               ...              BK>>> The fact that I have heard so much, but can't get an honest answer       BK>>> to any of it disturbes me. Other than that, the clear cults I       BK>>> dispise are Scientology and Moonyism. I would not vote for anyone       BK>>> beloinging to either of those.               RW>> Right, some of what I know about the mormon church was        RW>> passed down from my dad's mother's side of the family, who        RW>> resided in western ILlinois near the town of Nauvoo before        RW>> they got there. tHe main beef the locals had against them        RW>> was predatory business practices. Had they dealt fairly        RW>> with their "gentile' neighbors the hue and cry against them        RW>> in western Illinois wouldn't have been raised.        RW>> Brigand Young demonstrated that it was part of their        RW>> culture years later with the MOuntain MEadows massacre.              BK>> Now that about Nauvoo I had not known about. I did know about the       BK>> Mountain Meadow Massacre.               RW> Right, an artisan or craftsman who was a mormon gave one        RW> price if you were one of the flock, another, much higher,        RW> if you were a "gentile" and especially if he was the only        RW> craftsman doing that sort of work. There are a lot of               Which, today, would be religious discrimination.               RW> rumors still float around among some of the oldtimers        RW> around that part of the world about this one was driven out        RW> because the church had a craftsman they wanted to have a        RW> monopoly, or burnd out or in other ways driven off his land        RW> because the church wanted it. Always things just at the        RW> edge of criminal culpability, but ...               Even beyond the edge, but they got away with it.               RW> Even then cases had to be proved in court, often difficult        RW> to do, but it came to the point to where they'd jailed        RW> Joseph Smith, and the governor of ILlinois was willing to        RW> extend clemency, if JOe SMith and his true faithful got        RW> outa Dodge.               Only the locals decided to take things into their own hands.               RW> To be honest, I don't believe that we'll ever sort out fact        RW> from fiction regarding a lot of that. Still that gives me        RW> a lot of reason to distrust that church's leadership.               Like I said, any group that keeps secrets of their basic beliefs        is a group I can't accept.               ...              BK>>> Disaster preparedness is both an individual and a national       BK>>> responsibility. Individual is necessary for the short term,       BK>>> national for the long term. And a level for everything in       BK>>> between.               RW>> Again we would agree. IT's where the two meet in the        RW>> middle. i tell folks prepare for 7 days of "on your own"        RW>> after a disaster.              BK>> That is a very good standard. More won't hurt, less just might.               RW> lEss often will hurt. IF you're prepared for 7 days you're        RW> good, by then you can do something about formulating a        RW> workable plan even if there isn't a whole lot of help        RW> coming from outside. But that seven days and hopefully a        RW> couple more gives you some time to get your head together        RW> and formulate a workable plan, just in case help from        RW> outside hasn't arrived yet.               True on all points. I just read a local advice bit about three        days prepardness. That would cover almost anything that would go        wrong short of a major national disaster. Anything local,        tornado, hurricane, blizzard, and such help would be there in 3        days. Unless we have a republican president and you live in a        democratic district. Then maybe a week.                     BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn              ... Bad luck? Bad luck? My luck's so bad my virtual pet ran away...       --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]        * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 And Still Here. Join Us: www.DocsPl (1:123/140)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca