On 7/22/2012 7:18, BOB KLAHN -> JOHN MASSEY wrote:   
      
      
      
    BK>   Which does not address my response to your comment, nor your   
    BK>   comment itself. Until you can guarantee what medical care you   
    BK>   will need that's non-responsive to life.   
      
   Until you can guarantee your Government plan will cover what I need AND   
   will be there when I need it, I'll pass on it, and stay with what I've got.   
      
      
    BK>>>   should  not even seek treatment when you are injured or ill.   
      
    JM>> Why not I have insurance.   
      
    BK>   You said people with healthcare die. Unless you want to die   
      
   Not to many sane people want to die.   
      
      
    JM>> Should have said care for instead care about.   
    JM>>  You do understand the difference between "to care for"   
    JM>>  and "to care about."   
      
    BK>   Yes. But it's not as wide as you seem to think.   
      
   Or as close as you do.   
      
    BK>   So, you are   
    BK>   saying you wouldn't mind is someone you care about dies for lack   
    BK>   of medical care? Or is that just another diversion you throw out   
    BK>   there?   
      
   Of course I would mind. Most likely I would be upset, but life goes on.   
      
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.   
    * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)