Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,806 of 4,105    |
|    BOB KLAHN to JOHN MASSEY    |
|    Freedom!    |
|    07 Jul 12 03:19:44    |
       BK>>>> You don't even have to pay dues, you have to pay representation        BK>>>> fees, since by federal laws they have to represent you even if        BK>>>> you don't join.               JM>>> Shouldn't have too pay anything to any union for any        JM>>> reason. Especially to be allowed to work.               BK>> That's the free lunch philosophy. The union is responsible for        BK>> the fact that you have insurance, vacations, higher pay, etc.               JM> No. Bob, it is not. You forget I DO NOT WORK for a Company.               Actually, what I said is very likely true regardless. You get        the spill over from what the Unions have done. That has a long        history.               JM> I Have insurance BECAUSE I PAY FOR IT. I take vacations               Which you likely could not afford if unions hadn't spread        insurance across the population.               JM> ON MY OWN TIME, not when it fits in with what is        JM> convenient for a company or a union.               Are you saying you don't have any consideration for your        customer's needs, or for market realities? OTOH, you do        demonstrate how little you understand unions.               JM> I have HIGHER PAY        JM> because I can charge more because of the reputation I have        JM> built for quality work.               And you would have lower pay if the unions hadn't pushed up pay        scales in general.               BK>> The representation fees are appropriate because the union has to        BK>> represent you. If the law is changed so the union can let them        BK>> hang you and not lift a finger then your point is valid.        BK>> Otherwise, no.               JM> Representation fees are the same as extortion.               Are legal fees the same as extortion?               JM> WTF is a union going to represent me for? I don't owe the        JM> leaches of a union one thin penny.               Those who work for you would be much better off if they had        unions, now wouldn't they?                            BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn              ... If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be research.       --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]        * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 And Still Here. Join Us: www.DocsPl (1:123/140)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca