Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,664 of 4,105    |
|    BOB KLAHN to RICHARD WEBB    |
|    not like father and son    |
|    24 May 12 17:14:24    |
       ...              BK>> Rand seems to have no sensibilities other than what is best for       BK>> Rand. Being in the Tea Party camp should exclude him from       BK>> running as a republican.               RW> Yeah, but the tea party folks are essentially joined at the        RW> hip with the right wing of the Republican party, which        RW> bought and paid for them.               Actually both are bought and paid for by the .1%. Note, not the        1%, the .1%.               RW> The thing is, most libertarians I converse with regularly,        RW> and I do with a few, are very leery of Rand, and the tea        RW> partiers in general. The tea party according to many is        RW> seen as a dupe of a few plutocrats.               Oh, you already said that. Yeah, the right wing is no where near        libertarian.               RW> the trouble is, same plutocrats would like to coopt        RW> libertarianism under their banner, but these aren't folks        RW> interested in liberty in the true sense of the word. These               Right on both points.               RW> are folks hwo are into "More for me, screw you!"        RW> Most of those I would categorize as true libertarians are        RW> from the 'ain't nobodoy's business if you do" school. Your               Exactly. Which is why no libertarian will criticize Obama's        support of same sex marriage. Their rule will be, MYOB.               RW> beliefs, your choices are just that, yours. Goverment has        RW> no business meddling in private morality issues if it        RW> doesn't directly impact safety.               Exactly. That's pretty well where I stand on it. Some things you        might believe are morally wrong are still not the business of        government to regulate.               RW> I've evolved abit from        RW> that position, but still unless it can be proved that it        RW> impacts such things as ourairwaves, water supplies,        RW> environment etc. then it should be left alone.               True. We may argue over whether it does affect public issues,        but if it doesn't, MYOB.                                          BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn              --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]        * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 And Still Here. Join Us: www.DocsPl (1:123/140)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca