Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,590 of 4,105    |
|    BOB KLAHN to RICHARD WEBB    |
|    downsizing the U.S. military the right w    |
|    18 Apr 12 04:48:18    |
       ...               RW>> Continue to support the f35 aircraft. Its vertical takeoff        RW>> and landing capabilities can do a lot to make any flat top        RW>> transporter a carrier.              BK>> How does that compare to the Harrier? Is it that much better, to       BK>> justify the immense cost?               RW> Good question. i"m assuming better stealth capabilities or        RW> something, but I've never really seen a side by side        RW> comparison of the two or anything that even discusses the        RW> Harrier in the same piece with the f35. The harrier though               Just looked it up. The big difference I see is the F35 is        supersonic. The Harrier is not.               RW> is proven technology, it's been around for decades now        RW> iirc. One of our inveterate web crawlers could probably dig        RW> up a pretty good look at each.               The Harrier development dates back to the 50s. That part        surprised me.               The F35 does have some advanced technology, but I don't see why        that can't be grafted onto the Harrier. It's the speed advantage        that seems to make the difference.               RW>> Also, do more sea basing, which would require developing        RW>> faster transport for material.               RW>> The ideas made sense to this old man anyway.              BK>> I have doubt about the sea basing. I suspect that might be more       BK>> expensive.               RW> Yep, might be but that might be greatly offset, and        RW> therefore cheaper in the long run than all the diplomatic        RW> soft shoe shuffle dance crap.               True.              BK>> Free basing ain't so hot either.               RW> Ask Richard Pryor |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca