RW> Did anybody else read the article in the March 2012 Popular   
    RW> mEchanics entitled "The winning way to trim the pentagon"   
    RW> by any chance?   
      
    RW> i liked a lot of what i read there.  highlights were:   
      
    ...   
      
    RW> Continue to support the f35 aircraft.  Its vertical takeoff   
    RW> and landing capabilities can do a lot to make any flat top   
    RW> transporter a carrier.   
      
    How does that compare to the Harrier? Is it that much better, to   
    justify the immense cost?   
      
    RW> Also, do more sea basing, which would require developing   
    RW> faster transport for material.   
      
    RW> The ideas made sense to this old man anyway.   
      
    RW> Anybody else read the piece care to comment?   
      
    I have doubt about the sea basing. I suspect that might be more   
    expensive.   
      
    Free basing ain't so hot either.   
      
      
      
   BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn   
      
   ... I want some of whatever they're having, i could use my reality altered.   
   --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]   
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 And Still Here. Join Us: www.DocsPl (1:123/140)