Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DEBATE    |    Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat    |    4,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,145 of 4,105    |
|    Richard Webb to Lee Lofaso    |
|    Can You Say It?    |
|    13 Feb 12 21:08:39    |
      Hello Lee,              On Mon 2012-Feb-13 12:21, Lee Lofaso (3:800/432) wrote to Richard Webb:                     >DD>Same deal on term limits for elected officials. Many of them seem to       >DD>think that holding elected office is a lifetime sinecure. Which       >DD>certainly is *NOT* what the framers of the Constitution envisioned.              RW>OF course, but then the framers of the constitution never       RW>anticipated professional politicians. Their thought was       RW>that average folks would seek office as well as vote.              LL> The Framers of the Constitution were rich white men. Most of whom       LL> were lawyers. And all of them very much aware of professional       LL> politicians, especially those from England. They wanted to protect       LL> their own interests, and those of their friends. Not exactly what       LL> anybody would call "average folks".              True enough, but they had to give it more than just a "yeah       yeah" at least a wink and a nod. Aslo there were those who       weren't slave owners, though most were, as you say "rich       white men" including Franklin.              RW>Their efforts were geared toward eliminating a professional       RW>perpetual ruling class.              LL> Except rich white men.              LL> Black folk were not included in their version of America. Women       LL> folk were not included in their version of America. Poor folk were       LL> not included in their version of America. Only those who were white,       LL> male, Christian (preferably non-Catholic), and owned       LL> property/slaves, were included in their version of America.              True, for the most part, but remember, from the get go there were battle lines       drawn over the question of slavery. Some       time within the next few decades we'd finally get the       MIssouri compromise. The slavery question definitely       divided the framers, but they had to go forward, and hence       ignore that question, and put it off on those who would come after.              Regards,        Richard       ---        * Origin: (1:116/901)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca