home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   DEBATE      Enjoy opinions shoved down your throat      4,105 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,120 of 4,105   
   Lee Lofaso to John Massey   
   Can You Say It?   
   10 Feb 12 08:56:00   
   
   Hello John,   
      
   >JM>Still is multi-party.   
      
   >LL>Nope.  Multi-party by definition means more than two.   
      
   JM>Just because you don't count other political parties, for   
   JM>what ever reason, doesn't mean they don't exist.   
      
   The term "multi-party" is used in relation to "one-party"   
   and "two-party".  Hence, multi-party by definition means more   
   than two.   
      
   The US a two-party state.  Not a one-party state or a multi-party   
   state.  Although the US Constitution makes no mention of political   
   parties, there is nothing unconstitutional about political parties   
   or party affiliation.   
      
   There are dangers if no political parties would be allowed.   
   There are dangers if we would have a one-party state.   
   There are dangers if we continue to have a two-party state.   
   There are dangers if we choose to have a multi-party state.   
      
   The question is, what do we want?  And do we know what we want?   
      
   --Lee   
      
      
    * SLMR 2.1a * That honky cop is one ignorant motherfucker!   
      
   --- Maximus 3.01   
    * Origin: Xaragmata / Adelaide SA telnet://xaragmata.mooo.com (3:800/432)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca