Hello John,   
      
   >JM>Since you are not going to be able to vote Paul (at least as the   
   >JM>Republican) and you are not going voting for BO... why bother to   
   >JM>vote?   
      
   >LL>So you are in favor of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party   
   >LL>continuing to have a monopoly on U.S. politics?   
      
   JM>I see the question mark but it looks more like you trying   
   JM>to put words in my mouth.   
      
   Admit it, John.  You *love* the Democratic Party.  Really.   
   In fact, if there was no such thing as the Democratic Party   
   you would have to invent it.   
      
   JM>Where did you get the idea I was for in favor of the Democratic   
   JM>Party and the Republican Party continuing to have a monopoly on   
   JM>U.S. politics?   
      
   The Democratic Party and the Republican Party need each other   
   in order to continue in existence.  The only way they can do that   
   and remain in power is to work together to defeat the efforts of   
   other political parties gaining a foothold in U.S. politics.  IOW,   
   it is in their mutual best interest to conspire against those who   
   wish to upset the apple cart.   
      
   JM>Instead of  "So you are in favor of" you should have ask, So   
   JM>are you in favor of?   
      
   If you are opposed to the conspiracy that exists between the Democratic   
   Party and the Republican Party then you would not have shown any support   
   for any candidates of either political party.   
      
   >LL>From the time of   
   >LL>George Washington until the Civil War this country was a multi-party   
   >LL>democracy, not a two-party state.   
      
   JM>Still is multi-party.   
      
   Nope.  Multi-party by definition means more than two.   
      
   JM>History lesson deleated   
      
   Try taking up civics sometime.   
      
   --Lee   
      
      
    * SLMR 2.1a * Man, dat honky got no ass!   
      
   --- Maximus 3.01   
    * Origin: Xaragmata / Adelaide SA telnet://xaragmata.mooo.com (3:800/432)