Hello Bob,   
      
   >MM>"If Obama could sit in Rev Wrights church for 20 years and   
   >MM>not hear anything racist   
      
   >BK>What did you find from Rev Wright that was racist?   
      
   >LL>Rev. Wright is a black man, speaking to a black audience.   
   >LL>It's a black thing.  Black on black.  With a white man   
   >LL>looking on. Unnerstan'?   
      
   BK>I've used that line.   
      
   It's a black thang.  Something white folks don' unnerstan'.   
      
   >LL>Rev. Pat Robertson is a white man, speaking to a white   
   >LL>audience. It's a white thing.  White on white.  With a   
   >LL>black man looking on. Unnerstan'?   
      
   BK>Pat Robertson? You define him that way? Not white, you define   
   BK>him as a man? I thought he was just another servant of Satan.   
      
   Check out the Obama file -   
      
   http://theobamafile.com/   
      
   If that don' blow your mind, check out The Black Value System.   
   Expanded version -   
      
   http://theobamafile.com/_exhibits/BlackValueSystem.mht   
      
   The Black Value System used to be on Rev. Wright's web page.   
   Or rather his church's web page.  But no longer, as it got taken   
   down by Satan's minions.   
      
   >MM>then Ron Paul could publish a   
   >MM>newsletter for 20 years and not read anything racist." --   
   >MM>some guy on the internet. Wow! Speaks volumes about media   
   >MM>hypocrisy.   
      
   >BK>The piece in the newsletter was clearly racist. Not to mention   
   >BK>being fales.   
      
   >LL>Ron Paul claims not to have read any of those newsletters.   
      
   BK>Quite possible.   
      
   I still have loads of those newsletters on diskette.   
   Unfortunately, I no longer have a disk drive that supports   
   those diskettes.   
      
   >BK>Ron Paul seems to be in his own little world.   
      
   >LL>Texans love him.  And so do lots of other folks.   
      
   BK>I watched some of the Republican Debates. Ron Paul is the only   
   BK>candidate I felt was telling the truth.   
      
   As only a kook could tell it.   
      
   >LL>I have a good collection of those newsletters stored on   
   >LL>floppies. If I can find them, I'll start posting them.  I   
   >LL>should have enough to last at least until Election Day...   
      
   >LL>Er...   
      
   >LL>The rules do not mention newsletters, do they?   
      
   BK>I do believe they would be covered. Which is, not allowed. Put   
   BK>them on a website and link them.   
      
   Can you imagine the clamor that would cause?  The news media   
   would be hounding me like, forever.  Especially if Ron Paul starts   
   winning some primaries...   
      
   >LL>And speeches are also okay?   
   >LL>I can post entire newsletters, speeches, and rants?   
   >LL>Those are all on topic for this echo?   
      
   BK>Uh... no.   
      
   Oh, well.  At least I can post my recipes...   
      
   BK>Rants if they are all yours are ok.   
      
   I see you left yourself some wiggle room.   
      
   BK>The rule banning articles also covers newsletters.   
      
   Aha!  Podcasts are on topic! Or rather, transcripts of podcasts!   
   All I need now are volunteers to transcribe those podcasts...   
      
   --Lee   
      
      
    * SLMR 2.1a * "Ding Dong the Witch is Dead, the Wicked Witch is Dead"   
      
   --- Maximus 3.01   
    * Origin: Xaragmata / Adelaide SA telnet://xaragmata.mooo.com (3:800/432)