Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DBRIDGE    |    D'Bridge Support Echo    |    10,398 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,728 of 10,398    |
|    DAVE GOURD to All    |
|    cheap and easy firewall     |
|    31 Jan 19 19:10:38    |
      Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:57:08 -0400       From: DAVE GOURD       To: HECTOR SANTOS       Subject: cheap and easy firewall        Newsgroups: win.server.wish.list       Message-ID: <1037721428.33.0@winserver.com>       X-WcMsg-Attr: Rcvd       X-Mailer: Wildcat! Interactive Net Server v7.0.454.5       Lines: 49              Is there any that a very simple "firewall" or local blocking list       could be added to protect from smtp probes?               For example, if a lot of probing comes from a certain IP, a sysop could       manually add it to a 'deny' list which would not allow delivery of        mail or attempts to deliver mail trying to verify valid email       accounts which are later found on the newest "29 million e-marketing        addresses for $149.99" CD's. (they don't pay me for letting them steal       the addresses)              The list could updated at the admins discretion if the issues are       resolved.              I know there are firewalls and routers to do this, but something simple       to stop or at least slow down this activity from known abusers via a       local list could be MOST helpful.               The rbl built-in capabilites work great, but as many of us know these       lists are not perfect and often either overkill or very short of hitting       the target.               This would help stop the harvesting of email addresses via wcsmtp.                     Right now I could use something like this, have been getting killed with       24/7 dictionary probes. I don't mind the oversized log files as much as       the fact that since 11/01/2002, 6 of our accounts were verified this       way and 2 of those started getting spam yesterday.              Reporting the network abuse to ISP's is both labor intense and many       times as effective as pounding sand up one's butt.               The spamrbl works great IF the ip's are listed, and getting them listed       seems to be a lot like hunting for bigfoot or the loc ness monster, and       as sometimes known good ip's are listed and blocked ONLY because the are       part of a netblock/dialup pool and not as a separate IP.                     I don't really want to go through the hassle of learning firewalls right       now and the machine resources overhead, and can't justify the expense of       good hardware.                      Thoughts or ideas?              --       Dave              --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1        * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca