On Sun Dec-03-2017 21:09, Nick Andre (1:229/426) wrote to Mark Lewis:   
      
    NA> On 03 Dec 17  19:59:50, Mark Lewis said the following to Nick   
    NA> Andre:    
      
   ML>  NA> And I have politely emailed them a few times now, filled out forms,   
   ML>  NA> submitted every recent release for their review, etc etc.   
      
   ML>  NA> Crickets chirping.   
      
   ML> maybe there are not enough others reporting the FP??   
      
    NA> A decent anti-virus product should treat every inquiry seriously   
    NA> and not just when enough people make a case out of something. At   
    NA> the very least, have a  working Contact Us form on its website. But   
    NA> thats not as amusing as this:    
      
    NA> https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/6a7234448baf4c66951528e91b8f73f49   
    NA> 1ae5d9b19b1 0ebb8c131afe455244f1/detection   
      
    NA> Nevermind that this piece of crap Clam chowder poor excuse poorly   
    NA> supported "product" gives a false positive, but it gives a false   
    NA> positive where other WORSE crap poor excuse poorly supported   
    NA> alternatives PASS the files with no problem.   
      
    NA> None of this would be an issue if it wasn't the fact that Clam   
    NA> Chowder  never replies to my repeated messages and Janis at first   
    NA> treated the Clam results as more accurate than mine - I was told in   
    NA> no uncertain terms to "clean up my mess" and future hatching on the   
    NA> NAB would be affected.    
      
   I remember that.  I thought it was a poor, ill-conceived command(?) on her   
   part, but live and learn, I guess.   
      
   Those of us who are still using D'Bridge learned long ago to ignore remarks   
   like that.   
      
      
   Regards,   
      
   Roger    
   --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+ Our XP machine is in the dark   
    * Origin: NCS BBS - Houma, LoUiSiAna - (1:3828/7)