Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DBRIDGE    |    D'Bridge Support Echo    |    10,398 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,767 of 10,398    |
|    Nicholas Boel to mark lewis    |
|    BBS Promotion    |
|    10 Feb 17 21:55:14    |
      Hello mark,              On Fri Feb 10 2017 20:35:06, mark lewis wrote to Nicholas Boel:               NB>> You say potato, etc..               ml> yes and no... it is really easy to understand though...              I understand it just fine, though you seem to want to continue to teach me       something I already know. :)               ml> of course not... their glyphs are different than latin glyphs... this        ml> is really simple when looking at the old school way... there are              Therein lies the problem from my standpoint. I've used CP437 (and still do       when it comes to the BBS itself) and all it's limitations. Besides displaying       ANSI graphics on my BBS to callers using ANSI capable terminal programs, I'm       over the "old school way" when it comes to messaging. There should be no       limitations whatsoever. One should be able to read and write whatever they       desire. I went ahead and made that possible for myself. If others don't care       to do so, that's their choice.               ml> because it depends also on what his OS can display... what i mean by        ml> this is that he has to be able to load the OS with the needed code        ml> page to view them correctly but if he does that, he'll lose all the        ml> normal latin glyphs... switching to UTF-8 on the OS will alleviate              In this case (as well as many others) I don't think the OS has anything to do       with it. He's using Windows 10, which has the capabilities to use anything he       would be so inclinded to use for his own purposes. It's the antique FTN       software that is holding people back.              A lot of people choose to move on with their OS as they are released, but then       get upset when their software from the 80s doesn't continue to work. Had the       developers of that 80s software still been around today, they would have and       could have updated it to reflect new technology in modern OSes.              With that said, I don't fault anyone for using what they choose to use.       Whatever floats your boat and works best for you, by all means stick with it.       However, I've chosen to make changes in order to accomplish things I've wanted       to accomplish, and am okay with the fact that it may or may not work on       other's systems.              Regards,       Nick              ... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."       --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221        * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca