On 2017 Jan 19 11:42:06, you wrote to me:   
      
    WV>>> But besides those above I don't know any that don't conform more or   
    WV>>> less to the method described in the fsc proposal.   
      
    ml>> such as it is, it is a good attempt... hopefully it won't be used   
    ml>> like other proposals and standards to try to beat others into some   
    ml>> sort of submission...   
      
    WV> Well, developers have to decide for themselfs,   
      
   they can easily decide for themselves...   
      
    WV> but I think it would be a good thing if they followed this proposal,   
      
   as i said, it is a good attempt... if i were working on an areafix system, i   
   doubt that i would follow the document completely, though... that would   
   certainly be noted in the docs before someone came along screaming about   
   following the standard completely when they don't even know if the standard   
   (or proposal) was even consulted in the first place... that's why program   
   documentation proudly states things like "This program implements and adheres   
   to FTS-xxxx, FSP-yyyy, and foobar-zzzz"...   
      
    WV> if they are working on new functionality for their tossers AreaFix...   
      
   somehow i don't know that nick is working on new functionality for db's   
   areafix ;)   
      
   )\/(ark   
      
   Always Mount a Scratch Monkey   
   Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it   
   wrong...   
   ... Eating chicken makes you stupid. - American Beef Association.   
   ---   
    * Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)