Hello Roger,   
      
   On Tue Jan 10 2017 07:25:18, Roger Nelson wrote to Nicholas Boel:   
      
    RN> I realize that, but I wanted to share those facts here that I   
    RN> presented elsewhere and they were not aimed at you, but about the   
    RN> naysayers in other echoes when I began posting those headers, seen-bys   
    RN> and paths.  I didn't do it long because it soon dawned on me that I   
    RN> was dealing with some stoneheads that were too busy blaming D'Bridge   
    RN> and defending themselves to look at their own setups.  With those   
    RN> guys, it is always someone else's fault.  I look over my setup every   
    RN> time Nick puts out a new release just to be sure everything is as it   
    RN> should be.  It doesn't take much time and I am speaking only about my   
    RN> setup, which is about as simple as I can make it.   
      
   Understood.   
      
    RN> So, we were saying the same thing using different words.  That can   
    RN> happen.   
      
   Possibly to a certain degree. The jokes about Mystic were brought in during   
   the discussion of a certain individual, and were paired together to be assumed   
   as the problem. In this situation, it simply wasn't the case. Toning down the   
   assumptions before the discussion started blaming elephants and tooth fairies   
   seemed necessary before it got too out of hand.   
      
    RN>> regardless of what system it is.  What I did was point out that   
    RN>> there were dupes and printed the paths along with the headers and   
    RN>> in many cases, the MSGID was exactly the same.  Naturally, some   
    RN>> took afront to this and blamed D'Bridge simply because they don't   
    RN>> know better.   
      
   Gotta throw the blame somewhere besides in one's own lap, right? :)   
      
    RN> You won't see it here.  It only appears in some other echoes.   
    RN> D'Bridge has caught over 4400 dupes since July 31, 2016.  Those are   
    RN> what I consider legitimate dupes.  Remember a few months back when   
    RN> (here) I received 3MB of mail?  I think we all got an even number or   
    RN> more depending on the areas carried.   
      
   Yes, I remember. That's right about the time I began deleting dupes rather   
   than saving them. Now I very rarely see any legitimate dupes, which I seem to   
   enjoy much better than sifting through 100s per day.   
      
    RN> I'm still waiting for my ISP to enable IPv6.  I have a temp address,   
    RN> but it's one-way only.  My IPv4 address is static.   
      
   I'm not sure what you mean by a temp address (fe80:* = link local, maybe? That   
   would just be your operating system providing that, basically like 127.0.0.1),   
   and/or why in the world it would be one-way only.   
      
   Regards,   
   Nick   
      
   ... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."   
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
    * Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)