-=> Quoting Danny Ceppa to Nancy Backus on 01-06-06  23:03 <=-   
      
    DC>> Unless you are publishing something, there's very little need for    
    DC>> all of the fancy fonts.    
       
    NB> What I've needed the fonts for was making the overhead transparencies   
    NB> for illustrating talks/lectures or for putting up the words to songs   
    NB> for a group to sing, to get the letters large enough to read from a   
    NB> distance.   For regular work, straight ascii is certainly sufficient.   
    NB> :)    
      
    DC> Plain and large block works for that!     
      
   I think I usually use New Times Roman or some similar plainish font.   
      
    DC> As it is, I've seen some very poor choices.  Well, at least tried    
    DC> to see it!     
      
   I hear you!     
      
   It's a shame when "fancy" trumps "readable"...!   
      
   ttyl     neb   
      
   ... My mind wanders, but my body is too tired to follow!   
      
   ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20   
      
   --- ViaMAIL!/WC v1.60d   
    * Origin: Chowdanet (401-724-4410) telnet://chowdanet.com  (1:323/120)