Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DADS    |    Discussions amongst fathers    |    1,946 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 436 of 1,946    |
|    Nancy Backus to Maurice Kinal    |
|    Re: fonts was: echos    |
|    07 Jan 06 23:47:24    |
      -=> Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 01-07-06 01:32 <=-               MK> Dec 27 15:37 05, Nancy Backus wrote to Danny Ceppa:              I see my messages FINALLY made it out of Chowda...! Turned out to be a       glitch in the way the messages were going out/being received at the next       point....                NB> What I've needed the fonts for was making the overhead transparencies        NB> for illustrating talks/lectures or for putting up the words to songs         NB> for a group to sing, to get the letters large enough to read from a        NB> distance.               MK> So why does the computer need to display that other then perhaps the        MK> basic layout? Shouldn't only the printer matter that it gets the right        MK> fonts?               I'm using MicroEMACS as my text editor, so there is no way that I know       of to send the printer any information about fonts. I think the printer       I have has some latitude there, but I don't think that the built-in       choices include larger sized fonts than pretty much "normal" printing.               For looking at it for myself on the computer, I don't need to go back       into the gui program, I just use browse, unless I need to see how it       spaces on the transparency.               MK> Add to this people who don't even use computers for that        MK> particular reason (ie no printer or a printer just for printing        MK> straight text) and it seems to me that the same computer can be useful        MK> for a wider variety of reasons, most of which may not even need an        MK> overbloated OS, or worse, an overbloated OS wannabe.               Oh, I certainly agree. :)               NB> For regular work, straight ascii is certainly sufficient. :)               MK> I have one font I use for everything on the computer. It is a large        MK> one that I can read without glasses or standing on my head squinting        MK> just right while chanting 'Why, why, why ....'              I just have whatever it is that the computer normally has... and       whatever is set up in the programs I use. As far as I know, I don't       have any place to choose anything else.              It's larger now, now that we have a larger monitor screen... |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca