Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    DADS    |    Discussions amongst fathers    |    1,946 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 298 of 1,946    |
|    Danny Ceppa to Maurice Kinal    |
|    bragging rights    |
|    11 Dec 05 13:28:28    |
      On 10 Dec 05 17:49:06, Maurice Kinal got back to Danny Ceppa        -> Re: bragging rights                DC> That's partially because the user base has shrunk. IIRC, there were         DC> over 3,000 Echoes in FIDO.         MK> user base WANT to support that many echoes?               Most of those were viable back then.                MK> users. For instance - not that I am suggesting you actually do this -        MK> maybe there is an echolisting where the SIMPSONS would be better        MK> served if it weren't exclusively 'Simpsons'. I like the Simpsons but              That's a Yes and a No!                MK> feel no real need to talk about it in Fido except maybe how it        MK> pertains to some other wider, more encompassing subject, perhaps the        MK> state of affairs of TV comedy and/or cartoons.               At one time the SIMPSONS was getting 25 to 50 and more messages        per day. At that point it made sense to keep it as its own Echo.                MK> for Fido. How does it serve the users when the echoes are too narrow        MK> in their focus, LINUX for example, if the user is restricted to        MK> discussing the pure topic without being allowed to compare and        MK> contrast to other OS's?               It depends on the volume.                MK> They are ALL like that. Overall I think someone(s) really need to        MK> discuss the issue seriously in order to stem the obvious tide that        MK> isn't working favourably for Fido as a whole, users and sysops.               There are reasons to keep some Echoes open even though they are        inactive overall. And, it seems like evertime I announce that        I'm going to ax an Echo people drop in! '               DC> A Moderator needs to be active in their Echo. And no, not as a         DC> Moderator unless necessary. Popping in out of the blue because a         DC> someone requested Moderator intervention doesn't cut it.                MK> Neither does a heavy hand methinks. I believe discussion, serious or        MK> otherwise, is always a preferrable method for problem solving.               It depends on the Echo and postings. Most all of my Echoes are        non-contoversial and require little, if any, intervention.                      --- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30        * Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca