home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   DADS      Discussions amongst fathers      1,946 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,005 of 1,946   
   Nancy Backus to Maurice Kinal   
   Re: daughters was: Anyone   
   07 Oct 06 16:53:06   
   
   -=> Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 10-03-06  04:46 <=-   
      
    NB> Some of my sisters were more flamboyant and out-spoken with their    
    NB> ways of breaking away...   
      
    MK> Right.  That sounds more like my daughters, although from my   
    MK> perspective 'flamboyant and out-spoken' wasn't exactly how I looked at   
    MK> it but they probably did.    
       
   I imagine words such as argumentative, disrespectful, obnoxious,   
   impudent, arrogant and such, would better describe what you were   
   seeing...?   My one sister was very definitely flamboyant, by anyone's   
   account.  If there was more than one way to do something, she'd pick the   
   one most likely to garner attention.  It back-fired on her on more than   
   one occasion.  Still does... you'd think she'd learn...!   
      
    NB> My experience has been that if one is fair with kids, they respond   
    NB> favorably.  This even worked when I and hubby were able to help my   
    NB> youngest brother see M&D's point of view without provoking the usual   
    NB> rebellions from him.   
      
    MK> That can happen.  I am not sure if any 'input' I give the one kid that   
    MK> shows up here from time to time has any effect but I figure it is worth   
    MK> a shot.  His dad never complained about anything any time I've talked   
    MK> to him so I suspect any 'input' at least isn't hurting anything.   
       
   Sometimes the influence one has is only seen later, in how things work   
   out.  The fact that he sticks around to get said 'input' is in itself a   
   good sign... as is that he come back from time to time...  :)   
      
    NB> when they inwardly do...  An uninvolved adult is safer to agree with.    
    NB> :)   
      
    MK> Or safer to disagree with without causing any major disturbances in   
    MK> family dynamics.  Mind you I still 'win' when that happens but I doubt   
    MK> the kid ever feels he 'lost'.   
       
   Outside the family dymanics, it doesn't feel so much like taking   
   sides... just looking at things from different angles, perhaps.   
      
    NB> When they get a little older they figure out that they CAN agree and   
    NB> still remain independent...    
      
    MK> I am not sure.  I don't recall if that was an issue to me when I was a   
    MK> kid.  Seems to me my older sister had that problem with my parents,   
    MK> especially with my mother.   
      
   Most kids I've seen seem to go through at least a contrarian phase,   
   where it is necessary NOT to agree.  (Some are like that when they are   
   toddlers and never seem to grow out of it!)  But there are some for whom   
   that isn't an issue... you, actually me also for the most part.  My son   
   was one who thought at one point that he was actually being "adult" by   
   being contrary... no, he never told me that, I happened to overhear him   
   boasting of his mature behaviour (so-called) to one of his peers on the   
   telephone... I just had to shake my head, knowing the facts and a   
   different perspective on things...  :)   Since then, he DID acknowledge   
   to me how immature he actually was being then, as he looked back on   
   himself with a different focus on things.  :)   
      
   ttyl          neb   
      
   ... I predict that today will be remembered until tomorrow!   
      
   ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20   
      
   --- ViaMAIL!/WC v1.60d   
    * Origin: Chowdanet (401-724-4410) telnet://chowdanet.com  (1:323/120)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca