Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CROSSFIRE    |    Politics and Current Events    |    334 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 188 of 334    |
|    BOB KLAHN to EARL CROASMUN    |
|    Earl lies again.    |
|    24 Jan 11 19:11:32    |
       EC> The Sunday deadline for this thread hasn't arrived yet, but        EC> Bob has fully run it into the ground. All of the facts are        EC> intact. He never listed the ALL-POLITICS echo. In               ...               EC> It is called a "hijack warning," and it only goes out if        EC> the hijack fails. He has tried and failed several times. I        EC> have never tried. Those are the documented facts. The        EC> rest is just empty bluster from Klahn.               Earl lied.               It may be called a hijack warning in general, but officially it        is no such thing. If you try to relist your echo and get the        password wrong you get the same message. Even if there in no one        contesting the echo. If you change a password, and update with        an old message, or type in the update by hand and misspell the        password, you get the exact same message.               Earl claims he never tried. In fact, he did try to hijack All        Politics, when the robot had a problem. I have the emails        between myself and Thom about this. The echo was listed in my        name after I submitted proof I had updated it. Oh, and Earl had        not listed any version of all politics before that point. Check        the echolists of the time to confirm this.                      Can you deny that the echo was unlisted and dead before I        revived it?               Can you deny that I revived it?               Can you deny that *YOU* accepted me as the legitimate moderator        of the echo?               Can you show any evidence of any condition at that time by which        anyone could rationally claim I was not accepted by *EVERY*        poster as the legitimate moderator of the echo.               Can you show anyone making a claim that I was not the legitimate        moderator of the echo before Ross started his little coup?               In view of the above, can you make any case whatsoever that I        was in anyway dishonest in claiming to be the moderator of the        echo?                     BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn              ... Republicans-united by feelings of Victimhood, and obsessed with Revenge.       --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]        * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca