Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONTROVERSIAL    |    Controversial Topics, current events, at    |    415 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 374 of 415    |
|    Steven Wolf to All    |
|    Roe vs Wade    |
|    22 May 19 09:31:37    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1.echomailcontrove@1:267/160 214a853a       PID: Synchronet 3.17c-Linux Apr 30 2019 GCC       TID: SBBSecho 3.06-Linux r3.105 Apr 30 2019 GCC 7.3.0        Should this case be overturned? I peronally feel women should have all the       "rights" when it come to their unborn babies.. I believe the father should have       some say when it comes to abortion. In my own life my former wife aborted 2 of       "our" the key word being (our) children without my consent. She just went to       the clinic and had it done even though I objected. If the father of a child has       no say what makes people think the courts are going to stop women from doing       whatever they please? The courts will make damn sure the father's pay for these       kids though. You can count on that. I just think abortion clinics should at       least require a fathers signature. So what are your thoughts on this       controverial topic? If the unborn child has no rights does the father have any?               HusTler       *Havens BBS havens.synchro.net:23 (1:267/160)*       --- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux        * Origin: Origin: Havens BBS havens.synchro.net (1:267/160) (1:267/160)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 57/0 220/70 226/17 229/354 426 1014 240/5832 249/206       SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 267/800 280/464 317/3 322/757 342/200 393/68       SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/0 1 10 100 772/0 1 500 5020/932       PATH: 267/160 800 770/1 393/68 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca