Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONTROVERSIAL    |    Controversial Topics, current events, at    |    415 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 271 of 415    |
|    BOB KLAHN to ALL    |
|    90% of what they asked for.    |
|    10 Jul 11 23:07:24    |
       We have heard, over and over, how the Palestinains were offered        90% of what they wanted and turned it down. The right in America        uses this to condemn the Palestinians, without actually        explaining just what 90% of what they wanted means.               In today's paper there are competing columns, one by Nicholas        Kristof, and one by Charles Krauthammer. Kristof focused on how        the republicans had a chance at just what they demanded, but        balked at ending tax breaks for hedge fund managers, and a few        other tax advantages that benefit the very rich.               Krauthammer focused on how trivial the value of Obama's demans        were. He went on about how none of those changes would make a        significant dent in the budget. Yet they would make the        republicans agree to tax increases, no matter how trivial and        indirect. It appears Krauthammer thinks he is hitting Obama        hard on this, and making Obama appear to be grasping at straws        in his attempt to get something out of the republicans.               What he is really doing is making it absolutely clear that the        republicans had a chance at their 90% of what they demanded,        only haveing to give up a tiny portion of what the democrats        wanted, and they walked out.               The Republican party must have taken a page from the Palestinian        Authority's manual, Boehner must be channeling Arafat. They had        it all in their hands, and they walked out rather than give an        inch.               One anti-Arafat commentator said, at the time, that Arafat        didn't want to end the conflict, because to do so would have        ended Arafat's reason for being.               Boehner doesn't want to end the impass because to do so would        mean admitting negotiation is possible, reason is good,        compromise is rational even if it's just a very tiny compromise.        Boehner can't do that, he's written himself into the script for        the national drama as the conquering hero, and conquerers        dictate, they do not negotiate.               Boehner has a choice, his ego, or his country. It appears he is        going to chose his ego.               And we will pay the price.                     BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn              ... There is a current shortage of plowshares and a vast surplus of swords.       --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]        * Origin: Since 1991 And Were Still Here! DOCSPLACE.TZO.COM (1:123/140)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca