Hi Bob,   
      
   On Sat 2039-Apr-02 20:00, BOB KLAHN (1:123/140) wrote to RICHARD WEBB:   
      
      
      
    RW> Reading an article, yeah I know, NY times, not some folks'   
    RW> favorite rag, but talking about how much more we spend than   
    RW> many other countries on education, and how much less we get   
    RW> for it. AS they said, put the money in cultural programs,   
    RW> teachers, the real basics, less on hauling kids by bus, and   
    RW> athletics, and ... you know the drill.   
      
   BK> Actually, I see the athletics and arts and all the rest right in    
   BK> there. Used to do that. We still could if we stopped trying to do   
   BK> everything on the cheap. There is an occasional time to be    
   BK> reactionary. In this case, go back to doing it all.   
      
   Would be nice, because *all* of it is part of creating a   
   well rounded person ready to take his/her place as a   
   citizen, including the athletics.   
      
      
      
    RW> Depends on how you save money whether you're actually   
    RW> robbing from your own future or not though.   
      
   BK> Uh...yeah... and I say that's exactly what's happening. Or our    
   BK> grandchildren's.   
      
   That's exactly where it is, rob your grandchildren.   
      
      
      
    RW> That's my problem with them exactly. I understand the   
    RW> house has to win the majority of the time to stand in   
    RW> business, but when the house wins no matter what, and   
    RW> you've not got a choice but to play ...   
      
   BK> Thing is, in an honest game we can all win. They like to say it's   
   BK> not a zero sum game, but it actually is. At least the way they play   
   BK> it.   
      
   OF course it is, and imho the game has been rigged for a   
   long time.   
      
   BK>> Fifty seven? More like a hundred and fifty seven, and still   
   BK>> nothing on.   
      
    RW> YEah I know, but that Springsteen song came to mind, so I   
    RW> used Bruce's number .   
      
   BK> Aha! Was that Bruce Heinz? With the E-street ketchup company?    
      
   something like that .   
      
      
      
    RW> YEah I know, but if you can still everything you need or   
    RW> want who in his right mind would want to be king? THen you   
    RW> get the responsibility for all of it too.   
      
   BK> That's just it, it doesn't make sense. It can be good for all of    
   BK> us, but some do want to be king.   
      
   A true indicator of insanity imho. I'd rather not thank   
   you.   
      
    RW>> But, to make sure that hope and freedom go by the boards we   
    RW>> have to discount and marginalize true culture as well.   
    RW>> Music and art, screw them too. WE've caused there to be a   
    RW>> fight between the ignorant "we want it all for free" folks   
    RW>> and the creators who should expect to get paid for their   
    RW>> work.   
      
   BK>> Well, the Wall Street types want it all for free too, just in much   
   BK>> bigger measure.   
      
    RW> OF course they do, and they've set up the creative arts   
    RW> types and the true creators of the intellectual property   
    RW> that is now being fought over to lose no matter how it   
    RW> goes. When as a young man reading sci fi I thought of   
    RW> something like the internet I expected to see it become a   
    RW> true cultural renaissance, but these days I'm not so sure.   
      
   BK> Oh how I know what you mean. The internet does have so much    
   BK> potential, and so little delivered.   
      
   IT does, but we have there some real big problems. IF the   
   content is good enough to transcend the poor production its   
   creator can't profit from it.   
      
    RW> But, the creative artists who use it to get their art out   
    RW> there don't have the budget or the expert knowledge to   
    RW> create listenable or viewable product oftentimes.   
    RW> Acquiring the facilities and the expertise using them costs   
    RW> money, and in today's markets that isn't available.   
      
   BK> The Vietnam war era was a cultural renaisance period, IMO, but    
   BK> this is a time of decline. So much opportunity, and so hard to    
   BK> actually make something of it.   
      
   OF course it is, our young people were still learning actual science then.    
   The creative artists wanted to explore those   
   new technologies and techniques in the making of their art.   
   NOw we just demand cheaper tools, preferrably free. We   
   don't want to learn about the tools and techniques that go   
   along with them though.   
   THat's the biggest difference between the vw era and now.   
      
   BK> Try to steal intelectual property from the big guys and you will    
   BK> get nailed. But the little guy has so many barriers to get past.    
      
   RIght, and the trouble is, the corporates can protect their   
   intellectual property and even virtually steal it from its   
   true creators, often for payment of a pittance. ONe can   
   understand the music pirates and their anger against the   
   corporates, but they end up harming the very people who   
   create the content they want. The demand for free content   
   has driven the business I'm in to the edge of the cliff.   
   THe live entertainment end of things was always the race to   
   the bottom, but the truly high end providers of these   
   services who own a warehouse full of gear can still survive. But, in the   
   production end i.e. recording, mastering, post   
   production, etc. that part of the business has taken a real   
   beating in the last two decades.   
   I could tell you some stories there.   
      
      
      
   BK> I'm tired of this battle, I'm looking forward to the chance to   
   BK> actually go after the true bad guys.   
      
   DOn't I wish. THey're well insulated.   
      
      
      
   BK> I have a feeling it's going to get a lot worse before it gets    
   BK> better.   
      
   Looks that way from here as well.   
      
   Regards,   
    Richard   
   --- timEd 1.10.y2k+   
    * Origin: (1:116/901)   
|