home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   CONTROVERSIAL      Controversial Topics, current events, at      415 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 21 of 415   
   Richard Webb to BOB KLAHN   
   Pakistan   
   08 Jan 11 13:26:22   
   
   Hi Bob,   
      
   On Fri 2039-Jan-07 12:06, BOB KLAHN (1:123/140) wrote to RICHARD WEBB:   
      
      
    RW> Indeed!  IT takes trained troops, it takes willpower, it   
    RW> takes building of infrastructure, the things we're failing   
    RW> to do in Afghanistan.   
      
   BK>  Don't forget, nationbuilding is not good. Nationbuilding is bad.    
   BK> Nationbuilding is the work of Satan. We know that because right    
   BK> wingers tell us so.   
      
   IT has its downside, I'd agree there, but something *must*   
   be done in that region, and the better thing to do is   
   provide the troops and resources necessary to do just that.   
   PEople who have a future that is other than bleak don't have as much   
   motivation to fight to the point of their own   
   destruction.   
      
   BK>  Best to just let them live in anarchy and grow hard and bitter  and   
   BK> hate filled... what can they do, we are protected by oceans,  aren't   
   BK> we?   
      
   That ocean isn't a whole lot of protection these days,   
   especially when we listen to folks moan and groan as they   
   bring them over here on student visas and whatever else.   
      
    RW>> I'm still waiting to see that freedom for KUwait we fought   
    RW>> for ya know.  LEt's either do it right, or bring the young   
    RW>> men and women home.   
      
      
    RW> FUnny but nobody has anything to say about that.   
      
   BK>  After Kuwait I was thinking, the next president should vow that  no   
   BK> American soldier would be sent to fight, and put his life on  the   
   BK> line, and maybe die, unless it's for democracy for the   
   BK>  country they are fighting for.   
      
   I've always hoped for that one.  iF that's not what we're   
   fighting for I don't want the young folks going there to   
   die, for *any* other reason.  NO other reason is worth it   
   imho.  But, now we have a situation where we must do just   
   that, because there  are a couple of failed states that   
   we've either two choices:  Nation building or annihilation.   
   Funny how we went in my little over half a century lifetime   
   from being a beacon of freedom and justice to the world to   
   being vilified and considered inept.  WHat happened to that   
   beacon for liberty and justice we herad about in our civics   
   lessons?  IT got snuffed out, and then sold as parts for cheap oil.   
      
   BK>  The Emir of Kuwait would not have been allowed to return by my    
   BK> rules.   
      
   MIne either, but he did return.  Even then I was saying to   
   folks that they shouldn't confuse dying for oil with   
   fighting for freedom.   
      
      
   BK>>  Maybe just do some precision surgery of the Pakistan   
   BK>>  intelligence service.   
      
    RW> There's a thought.  ISI essentially operates with autonomy.   
      
   BK>  Exactly my thought.   
      
   Appears they're gonna be running the show in the whole   
   country anyway.   
      
      
      
    RW> this is true, but they'll continue to fail unless something   
    RW> drastic is made to happen.  Had to pause while writing this   
    RW> msg for the xyl to read me an article from this morning's   
    RW> paper.  Seems the government over there is breaking up.   
    RW> THe more moderates are bailing out of parliament and the   
    RW> cabinet twould appear.   
      
   BK>  From what I have heard about that, the parties that are bailing    
   BK> out are not planning to bring down the government. None of them    
   BK> want to be responsible for bringing back the military rule.    
      
   RIght, but the military will rule over there, and I'm not   
   sure which way that one will go yet.   
      
   BK>>  OTOH, we need to rein in India's nuke activities also. Damn so   
   BK>> much we need to do.   
      
   RIght, but isn't some of India's nuke activity power   
   generation related as well?   
      
    RW> Right, and the way to rein in INdia's nuclear ambition is   
    RW> to deal with the failed state which is their neighbor.   
      
   BK>  I suspect India would still want to be the dominant power so  they   
   BK> would keep the nukes. They all need to be under world   
   BK>  pressure.   
   Probably, but if I had to make a choice I'd just as soon   
   INdia have the whip hand.   
      
   Regards,   
              Richard   
   --- timEd 1.10.y2k+   
    * Origin:  (1:116/901)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca