Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 931 of 2,445    |
|    Aaron Thomas to Rob Mccart    |
|    Re: Your Gmail search res    |
|    25 Mar 25 08:04:46    |
      TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A49       MSGID: 1:342/200 40619d0a       REPLY: 640.consprcy@1:2320/105 2c47dfe9       TZUTC: -0700        RM> >important either, but the issue here is the chip on my shoulder about b        RM> >tec        RM> >nd companies with big names.        RM>         RM> Yes, and the other thing here is most companies and banks and such try        RM> their best to force you to go with electronic statements rather than        RM> mailing paper. They don't ask you to change, if you have an eMail address              That's a good point, and I never thought about it this way until now. Before I       thought "they want to pretend to be tree-huggers" or "they want to save money       on postage," but I think your analogy is more likely true.               RM> Yes, in a big way. They do offer some good services that we don't have        RM> to pay for so they have to make some money off of us somewhere and        RM> selling information about us seems to be the best way..              This is another good point. How does Google make so much money when they don't       even sell anything? Well, I think we've discovered the answer to that ;)               RM> On that one I'm just about as bad. I prefer the results I get using Bing        RM> instead of Google, but if I start getting targeted ads from them or        RM> something I'd use a safer one like (I think) DuckDuckGo..        RM>         RM> That said, possibly I'm just better protected due to my Browser.        RM> I use Opera, a highly modified version of Chrome or Mozilla              I don't fully understand how one browser could be less vulnerable to tracking       than another. If there's one that's open source, then I'd like to examine the       source to see if what it's doing with information that is typed (keylogging,       sending info to a database, stuff like that.) But I haven't taken the time to       do that yet because I'm just not very concerned about covering my tracks.       (Although I'm glad to throw a curveball to big tech whenever it's convenient.)              --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)        * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 226/30       SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 111 114 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664       SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 202 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/105 5075/35       PATH: 342/200 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca