TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 303.consprcy@1:2320/105 2c2b2005   
   REPLY: 1:342/201 b3853eb2   
   PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 202 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 2024 23:04 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   >  KW> I'd have a hard time believing that the US government selling the Nancy   
   >  KW> Pelosi building in San Francisco then leasing it back at a profit to the   
   >  KW> buyer was an entirely financial move.   
      
   > That's another story I'm not familiar with. It's local news for you. What's   
   up   
   > with it? By the way you described it, it sounds like a profitable thing for   
   th   
   > government to do.   
      
   It means the US Government owned it, had equity in it, sold it to someone   
   else and are now paying that someone else rent money.   
      
   Here in Kentucky, administrations used to "pay" donors by renting buildings   
   from them vs. owning their own.  KY eventually came to realize that it   
   was cheaper to either own outright, or have a mortgage on, their own   
   buildings and got out of all the rental agreements they could.   
      
   I wouldn't mind hearing more about this San Fransisco deal but it sounds   
   like on the surface that they are wasting money.   
      
      
    * SLMR 2.1a * Never fight with a bear in his own cave.   
   --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 226/30   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 111 114 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664   
   SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426