Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 537 of 2,445    |
|    Mike Powell to All    |
|    "Network blocking is neve    |
|    01 Mar 25 12:50:00    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 251.consprcy@1:2320/105 2c288294       PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 202 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 2024 23:04 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       "Network blocking is never going to be the solution" Cloudflare slams       anti-piracy tactics              Date:       Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:07:10 +0000              Description:       Amid European countries' ever-more aggressive tactics, Cloudflare suggests we       should think of any type of internet block as censorship and calls for more       transparency.              FULL STORY       ======================================================================              Increasingly, countries, especially in Europe, have been enforcing strict       measures lately to halt the spread of pirated content. Yet, Cloudflare, a       leading DNS server provider, told TechRadar that "network blocking is never       going to be the solution. "               DNS providers were the first to be targeted with blocking orders and lawsuits       by French, Spanish, and Italian authorities. However, these authorities have       now begun targeting some of the best VPN services on similar grounds.       Technologists, however, have long warned that these tactics lead to       disproportionate overblocking incidents while undermining people's internet       freedom.               "Those kinds of network blocking efforts are having collateral effects and        are ruining the internet," Vice President and Global Head of Public Policy at       Cloudflare , Alissa Starzak, told TechRadar, suggesting we should think of        any internet block as censorship.              Why are DNS and VPNs the target of rightsholders?              Short for domain name system, a DNS acts as the internet phone book. It       essentially translates users' requests into strings of numbers IP addresses       to connect them with the right websites on the web. DNS servers are then       essential to navigate the internet, making these services a target of censors       and, like in this case, rightholders alike.                A virtual private network (VPN) is then a security software that masks        users' real IP addresses. While this skill is crucial to bypass strict       government-imposed internet restrictions, it can also be used as a workaround       to current anti-piracy tactics that involve blocking access to piracy sites       based on users' browsing location. This is exactly what some European       rightsholders want to prevent.               After a successful legal action against DNS services last year, French       streaming giant Canal+ now wants to block VPN usage , too. It has teamed up       with France's professional football league agency, Ligue de Football       Professionel (LFP), to issue court orders against the likes of NordVPN ,       ProtonVPN , CyberGhost , ExpressVPN , and Surfshark .               Italy has also announced plans to upgrade its infamous Piracy Shield system        to extend blackout orders against VPNs and public DNS providers.        Specifically, rightsholders can demand piracy-related domain names and IP       addresses suspected of copyright infringement to be blocked within 30        minutes.              The Italian case shows how this action can lead to dangerous overblocking       incidents, Starzak explains.               "They have blocked some of our IP addresses at various times and even Google       Docs got blocked [by mistake] at one point," she said, pointing out the lack       of transparency and accountability around these events. "If you agree that a       certain piece of content can be targeted and you're blocking other stuff       that's should be legally problematic."               The newly launched attack to VPN usage is a further escalation of these       "aggressive" anti-piracy measures in Europe, which has opened up even more       questions about the legality of these actions.               As Starzak told TechRadar, the French lawsuit isn't based on numbers and       facts, but simply on the idea that people might access pirated content        through a VPN.               She said: "You could argue that an internet shutdown would also solve your       problem. There wouldn't be any streaming if you shut down the internet,        right? That's where proportionality comes into play. It's not that every       possible mechanism to prevent something is the right answer." What's next?               While DNS servers are still in open litigation in France, the VPN Trust       Initiative (VTI), whose targeted members include NordVPN, ExpressVPN, and       Surfshark, confirmed to TorrentFreak the providers are considering leaving        the country over the blocking demands.               "Weve seen this before in markets like India and Pakistan, where regulatory       requirements forced some VPN services to withdraw rather than compromise on       encryption standards or log-keeping policies," said VTI Executive Director       Christian Dawson. "Frances potential move to force VPN providers to block       content could put companies in a similar position."               The DNS and VPN industries also worry that these legal actions could create a       blueprint for more countries to follow suit.               Starzak believes lawmakers and rightholders should find a more balanced       approach to tackle online piracy where oversight, consistency, and       transparency go hand in hand.               "It doesn't mean that there may not be a role for network blocking in limited       cases, but we have to start putting some controls instead of randomly       blocking. We need to understand what's acceptable and what's not," she said.       "Once you start marching down the network blocking path, you may forget       there's this whole other path of potential solutions that hasn't been       considered."              ======================================================================       Link to news story:       https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/network-blocking-is-never-g       oing-to-be-the-solution-cloudflare-slams-anti-piracy-tactics              $$       --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux        * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 226/30       SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 111 114 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664       SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 3634/12 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca