TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 206.consprcy@1:2320/105 2c25b49f   
   REPLY: 1:342/201 9667c0f6   
   PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 202 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 2024 23:04 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   > Setting bail based on income sounds like a good idea, but I honestly don't   
   kno   
   > what was wrong with the original system. My state rep said "The cash bail   
   > system wasn't fair to poor people," but the crimes they are accused of aren't   
   > fair to the crime victims.   
      
   I think that is the problem with the original system, or at least it is the   
   complaint about it.  If bail was based on income, or the abilty of the   
   accused to pay it, that should eliminate the complaint that the system is   
   not fair to poor people.  I don't necessarily believe it would lead to more   
   people being let go, which is not fair to victims, and would be more fair   
   to everyone... certainly more so than "cashless bail."   
      
      
    * SLMR 2.1a * Football players do it after they are blitzed.   
   --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 226/30   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 111 114 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664   
   SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426